Have
I mentioned my love for Colorlines? Oh, I have? Too damn bad nerds. Seth
Freed Wessler wrote up the recent legislation proposing drug testing
welfare recipients on Tuesday, and he’s spot on.
Last
week a federal appeals court ruled against the Florida law that required
welfare recipients pass a drug test to qualify for benefits. Of course, this
made Rep. Stephen Fincher (R-Tenn) think what a great idea, let’s do this on
the federal level. His bill would require states to collect urine samples
randomly for 20 percent of adults who receive benefits from TANF.
Rep.
Fincher said, “ By allowing random drug check, we can ensure families who
receive TANF benefits use them for their intended purpose of feeding, clothing
and providing shelter for their children, while cutting the tie that enables
drug abuse. It’s not unreasonable to ask folks to stay clean in order to
receive federal assistance.”
Did you get that? Poor people can't be trusted. They aren't responsible with money, if they were they wouldn't be poor. This man's logic is awe inspiring; sorry, I mean his idiocy.
Yes
it is unreasonable to do this. Partially because this isn’t cost effective, but more on that later. Partially
because substance abuse is an addiction, a sickness, and they need help. But
mostly because most TANF recipients aren’t drug users, but they are citizens
who are covered by the Fourth Amendment.
TANF
provides on average the destitute an average of less than $400 a month, and
many eligible families with children don’t receive checks because of the
limited block grant. Several states (FL, GA, ND, etc.) have attempted to impose
mandatory drug tests on welfare recipient, which has resulted in legislation looking
for a problem. In Florida for example, a drug testing program for was employed
over several months until the courts blocked it, and it founds 98% of
applicants passed the drug test.
The
11th Circuit Court of Appeals’ ruled last week to uphold the lower
court’s decision to block the Florida law, and the decision applies to a
similar law in Georgia. The panel of judges said Florida has failed to prove
that substance abuse among welfare recipients is a problem; one judge wrote, “The
State has presented no evidence that simple because an applicant for TANF
benefits is having financial problems, he is also drug addicted or prone to
fraudulent and neglectful behavior.”
Well,
no shit. So the court’s decision was based on possible violation of the Fourth Amendment
which protects against unreasonable search and seizure because you know they
have no proof or suspicion of drug use.
Fincher’s
bill aims to get around these constitutional concerns by requiring all welfare recipients
sign “a waiver of constitutional rights with respect to testing.” Because poor
people aren’t citizens anymore. The bill reads: “The State may not use any part
of the grant to provide assistance to any individual who has not signed a
waiver.”
So
he’s actually trying to do away with welfare. Forfeit your rights or you don’t
qualify. He tried to get this bill through in 2011, and has little chance of
passing this year. However, his website has a phone number (202) 225-4714 for a
Elizabeth Lauten. I plan to call her and ask her what the bill is rooted in,
how come we’re assuming TANF recipients use drugs, is this racism, and why poor
people in Tenn. don’t have constitutional rights.