Friday, August 31, 2012

So awesome I had to post this


Thanks! This is from the Sheet Metal Workers' International Association's Facebook Page.

Paul Ryan's RNC Speech through my lens

Again I couldn't watch this crazy. Apparently, Paul Ryan brought the crazy and the lies. Same rules as last time, red was added by me. Let the fiction begin:


The GOP Vice Presidential nominee Rep. Paul Ryan's convention speech, as prepared for delivery.

"Mr. Chairman, delegates, and fellow citizens: I am honored by the support of this convention for vice president of the United States. 

I accept the calling of my generation to give our children the America that was given to us, with opportunity for the young and security for the old – and I know that we are ready to cut social security.  I accept the duty to help lead our nation out of a jobs crisis and back to prosperity – and I know we can do this. 
Our nominee is sure ready. His whole life has prepared him for this moment – to meet serious challenges in a serious way, without excuses and idle words.  After four years of getting the run-around, America needs a turnaround, and the man for the job is Governor Mitt Romney. 
I’m the newcomer to the campaign, so let me share a first impression.  I have never seen opponents so silent about their record, and so desperate to keep their power.  
They’ve run out of ideas.  Their moment came and went. Fear and division are all they’ve got left and this from a party who knows fear: for further reference see the War on Terror.    
With all their attack ads, the president is just throwing away money – and he’s pretty experienced at that on unending wars...wait wrong President, but you know.  You see, some people can’t be dragged down by the usual cheap tactics, because their ability, character, and plain decency are so obvious – and ladies and gentlemen, that is Mitt Romney.   
For my part, your nomination is an unexpected turn.  It certainly came as news to my family, and I’d like you to meet them: My wife Janna, our daughter Liza, and our boys Charlie and Sam.  
The kids are happy to see their grandma, who lives in Florida.  There she is – my Mom, Betty.  
My Dad, a small-town lawyer, was also named Paul.  Until we lost him when I was 16, he was a gentle presence in my life.  I like to think he’d be proud of me and my sister and brothers, because I’m sure proud of him and of where I come from, Janesville, Wisconsin.  I'm just like you! Not a career politician at all.    
I live on the same block where I grew up.  We belong to the same parish where I was baptized.  Janesville is that kind of place. 
The people of Wisconsin have been good to me.  I’ve tried to live up to their trust.  And now I ask those hardworking men and women, and millions like them across America, to join our cause and get this country working again. By disbanding unions and stripping them of rights. You know what will really turn this country around? A return to sweatshop labor. 
When Governor Romney asked me to join the ticket, I said, “Let’s get this done” – and that is exactly, what we’re going to do.  By stripping women, minorities, LGBTQ individuals, and anyone else we don't like of rights. 
President Barack Obama came to office during an economic crisis, as he has reminded us a time or two.  Those were very tough days, and any fair measure of his record has to take that into account.  My home state voted for President Obama. When he talked about change, many people liked the sound of it, especially in Janesville, where we were about to lose a major factory.  
A lot of guys I went to high school with worked at that GM plant. Right there at that plant, candidate Obama said: “I believe that if our government is there to support you … this plant will be here for another hundred years.”  That’s what he said in 2008. 
Well, as it turned out, that plant didn’t last another year.  It is locked up and empty to this day. Lie. This plant was closed while G.W. was president.  And that’s how it is in so many towns today, where the recovery that was promised is nowhere in sight.  
Right now, 23 million men and women are struggling to find work.  Twenty-three million people, unemployed or underemployed.  Nearly one in six Americans is living in poverty.  Millions of young Americans have graduated from college during the Obama presidency, ready to use their gifts and get moving in life.  Half of them can’t find the work they studied for, or any work at all.  Why are these guys talking about work? Every time they do I loose my damn mind. 
So here’s the question: Without a change in leadership, why would the next four years be any different from the last four years? 
The first troubling sign came with the stimulus.  It was President Obama’s first and best shot at fixing the economy, at a time when he got everything he wanted under one-party rule.  It cost $831 billion – the largest one-time expenditure ever by our federal government. What we don't want to talk about GM here? Or the success of the auto bailout?
It went to companies like Solyndra, with their gold-plated connections, subsidized jobs, and make-believe markets. The stimulus was a case of political patronage, corporate welfare, and cronyism at their worst. You, the working men and women of this country, were cut out of the deal.  Didn't a lot of these funds go to Wisconsin? And how does a Republican hailing from Wisconsin talk about working men and women and keep a straight face?
 What did the taxpayers get out of the Obama stimulus?  More debt.  That money wasn’t just spent and wasted – it was borrowed, spent, and wasted.     
Maybe the greatest waste of all was time. Here we were, faced with a massive job crisis – so deep that if everyone out of work stood in single file, that unemployment line would stretch the length of the entire American continent.  You would think that any president, whatever his party, would make job creation, and nothing else, his first order of economic business.  Ok, go. I demand a job creation plan immediately. How many people are the Romney/Ryan ticket going to provide a paycheck for? I doubt they are going the FRD route.  
But this president didn’t do that.  Instead, we got a long, divisive, all-or-nothing attempt to put the federal government in charge of health care.  
Obamacare comes to more than two thousand pages of rules, mandates, taxes, fees, and fines that have no place in a free country.  Regulations and rules! Oh no! But we're not the party of fear.                                       
The president has declared that the debate over government-controlled health care is over.  That will come as news to the millions of Americans who will elect Mitt Romney so we can repeal Obamacare. 
And the biggest, coldest power play of all in Obamacare came at the expense of the elderly. Whom I don't want to receive Medicare.  
You see, even with all the hidden taxes to pay for the health care takeover, even with new taxes on nearly a million small businesses, the planners in Washington still didn’t have enough money.  They needed more.  They needed hundreds of billions more.  So, they just took it all away from Medicare.  Seven hundred and sixteen billion dollars, funneled out of Medicare by President Obama. I'm pretty sure this is a lie too, but I'm not up to date on my Medicare funding reports. An obligation we have to our parents and grandparents is being sacrificed, all to pay for a new entitlement we didn’t even ask for.  The greatest threat to Medicare is Obamacare, and we’re going to stop it."

"In Congress, when they take out the heavy books oh no, not books and wall charts about Medicare, my thoughts go back to a house on Garfield Street in Janesville.  My wonderful grandma, Janet, had Alzheimer’s and moved in with Mom and me.  Though she felt lost at times, we did all the little things that made her feel loved.  
We had help from Medicare, and it was there, just like it’s there for my Mom today.  Medicare is a promise, and we will honor it.  A Romney-Ryan administration will protect and strengthen Medicare, for my Mom’s generation, for my generation, and for my kids and yours.  Until you blink and we destroy the social safety net. 


Obamacare, as much as anything else, explains why a presidency that began with such anticipation now comes to such a disappointing close.  So our opponents can consider themselves on notice.  In this election, on this issue, the usual posturing on the Left isn’t going to work.  Mitt Romney and I know the difference between protecting a program, and raiding it.  Ladies and gentlemen, our nation needs this debate.  We want this debate.  We will win this debate.    
It began with a financial crisis; it ends with a job crisis.  And my running mate exported all those jobs. 
It began with a housing crisis they alone didn’t cause; it ends with a housing crisis they didn’t correct. Because we wouldn't let them. Regulation is the devil. Deregulate everything and then blame the pro-regulation guys when everything falls apart. 
 It began with a perfect Triple-A credit rating for the United States; it ends with a downgraded America.   I'm pretty sure we were getting down graded anyway...
It all started off with stirring speeches, Greek columns, the thrill of something new.  Now all that’s left is a presidency adrift, surviving on slogans that already seem tired, grasping at a moment that has already passed, like a ship trying to sail on yesterday’s wind.  
President Obama was asked not long ago to reflect on any mistakes he might have made.  He said, well, “I haven’t communicated enough.”  He said his job is to “tell a story to the American people” – as if that’s the whole problem here? He needs to talk more, and we need to be better listeners? I'd rather have Ryan and Romney talk less and try to stick to facts. This is like the popular girl in high school who would just talk and talk, but never really say anything or just share unsubstantiated gossip.   
Ladies and gentlemen, these past four years we have suffered no shortage of words in the White House.  What’s missing is leadership in the White House.  And the story that Barack Obama does tell, forever shifting blame to the last administration, is getting old.  The man assumed office almost four years ago – isn’t it about time he assumed responsibility? 
 In this generation, a defining responsibility of government is to steer our nation clear of a debt crisis while there is still time.  Back in 2008, candidate Obama called a $10 trillion national debt “unpatriotic” – serious talk from what looked to be a serious reformer.  
Yet by his own decisions, President Obama has added more debt than any other president before him, and more than all the troubled governments of Europe combined.  One president, one term, $5 trillion in new debt. I think this is a lie too. But I'd have to look at the budget, plus we know Republican Presidents with Democrat Congress tend to spend more than Democrat Presidents with Republican Congress. 
He created a bipartisan debt commission. They came back with an urgent report.  He thanked them, sent them on their way, and then did exactly nothing. Um, pretty sure this is a lie too. Dems and Republicans are both unwilling to work together on creating a budget that doesn't gut necessary programs without touching military spending. 
Republicans stepped up with good-faith reforms and solutions equal to the problems.  How did the president respond?  By doing nothing – nothing except to dodge and demagogue the issue. 
So here we are, $16 trillion in debt and still he does nothing.  In Europe, massive debts have put entire governments at risk of collapse, and still he does nothing. And all we have heard from this president and his team are attacks on anyone who dares to point out the obvious.  I swear I read somewhere that House Republicans didn't want to get involved in the European debt crisis. 
They have no answer to this simple reality: We need to stop spending money we don’t have. 
My Dad used to say to me: “Son.  You have a choice: You can be part of the problem, or you can be part of the solution.”  The present administration has made its choices. Because choice still exists, but not for long if we have our way.  And Mitt Romney and I have made ours: Before the math and the momentum overwhelm us all, we are going to solve this nation’s economic problems.  At the expense of the poor.
And I’m going to level with you: We don’t have that much time.  But if we are serious, and smart, and we lead, we can do this. We have to hurry the sky is falling! China is buying US bonds! Fear! Fear! 
After four years of government trying to divide up the wealth, we will get America creating wealth again through the exploitation of others. With tax fairness and regulatory reform because we need less regulation and poor people should pay more and the wealthy less, we’ll put government back on the side of the men and women who create jobs, and not the men and women who need jobs.  
My Mom started a small business, and I’ve seen what it takes. Mom was 50 when my Dad died.  She got on a bus every weekday for years, and rode 40 miles each morning to Madison.  She earned a new degree and learned new skills to start her small business.  It wasn’t just a new livelihood.  It was a new life.  And it transformed my Mom from a widow in grief to a small businesswoman whose happiness wasn’t just in the past. With what funds?  Her work gave her hope.  It made our family proud.  And to this day, my Mom is my role model. 
Behind every small business, there’s a story worth knowing.  All the corner shops in our towns and cities, the restaurants, cleaners, gyms, hair salons, hardware stores – these didn’t come out of nowhere.  A lot of heart goes into each one.  And if small businesspeople say they made it on their own, all they are saying is that nobody else worked seven days a week in their place.  Nobody showed up in their place to open the door at five in the morning.  Nobody did their thinking, and worrying, and sweating for them.  After all that work, and in a bad economy, it sure doesn’t help to hear from their president that government gets the credit.  What they deserve to hear is the truth: Yes, you did build that.   
We have a plan for a stronger middle class, with the goal of generating 12 million new jobs over the next four years. Through tax breaks for the wealthy and corporations. So they can continue to under pay their employees, outsource jobs, and kill small businesses. 
In a clean break from the Obama years, and frankly from the years before this president, we will keep federal spending at 20 percent of GDP, or less.  That is enough.  The choice is whether to put hard limits on economic growth, or hard limits on the size of government, and we choose to limit government.  Except for women and gay rights. Government is going to be all up in your business, vaginas, and bedrooms. 
I learned a good deal about economics, and about America, from the author of the Reagan tax reforms – the great Jack Kemp.  What gave Jack that incredible enthusiasm was his belief in the possibilities of free people, in the power of free enterprise and strong communities to overcome poverty and despair.  Free, privileged people. This is all very Ayn Rand, and it scares me a bit. We need that same optimism right now.  
And in our dealings with other nations, a Romney-Ryan administration will speak with confidence and clarity.  Wherever men and women rise up for their own freedom, they will know that the American president is on their side. Except at mic checks and anytime the people organize or assembly. Especially when a union is involved.  Instead of managing American decline, leaving allies to doubt us and adversaries to test us, we will act in the conviction that the United States is still the greatest force for peace and liberty that this world has ever known. USA! USA! We're number 1. 
President Obama is the kind of politician who puts promises on the record, and then calls that the record.  But we are four years into this presidency. The issue is not the economy as Barack Obama inherited it, not the economy as he envisions it, but this economy as we are living it.  
College graduates should not have to live out their 20s in their childhood bedrooms because that is something privilege kids shouldn't have to do, only the generational poor, staring up at fading Obama posters and wondering when they can move out and get going with life.  Everyone who feels stuck in the Obama economy is right to focus on the here and now.  And I hope you understand this too, if you’re feeling left out or passed by: You have not failed, your leaders have failed you. " That sounds like what every privileged kid says when they loose "their spot"in their college. You know what was owed to them for some reason they can't express. That being said, I don't disagree completely. Leaders have failed. They have been bought and paid for by corporations and there should be a reckoning. 

"None of us have to settle for the best this administration offers – a dull, adventureless journey from one entitlement to the next like Social Security, a government-planned life, a country where everything is free but us.  Rand again, who received public assistance before her death by the way. 
Listen to the way we’re spoken to already, as if everyone is stuck in some class or station in life, victims of circumstances beyond our control, with government there to help us cope with our fate. We all have complete control over our lives! Unless they are demanding your papers in Arizona, control over your body because you're a woman, or denying you human rights because you're gay. 

 It’s the exact opposite of everything I learned growing up in Wisconsin, or at college in Ohio, I know I'm ashamed too.  When I was waiting tables, washing dishes, or mowing lawns for money, I never thought of myself as stuck in some station in life.  I was on my own path, my own journey, an American journey where I could think for myself, decide for myself, define happiness for myself. Which has nothing to do with my being white, male, hetero, Christian, etc. That’s what we do in this country.  That’s the American Dream as provide by white people.  That’s freedom, and I’ll take it any day over the supervision and sanctimony of the central planners.  
By themselves, the failures of one administration are not a mandate for a new administration.  A challenger must stand on his own merits.  He must be ready and worthy to serve in the office of president.  
We’re a full generation apart, Governor Romney and I.  And, in some ways, we’re a little different.  There are the songs on his iPod, which I’ve heard on the campaign bus and on many hotel elevators. He actually urged me to play some of these songs at campaign rallies.  I said, I hope it’s not a deal-breaker Mitt, but my playlist starts with AC/DC, and ends with Zeppelin.
 A generation apart. That makes us different, but not in any of the things that matter.  Mitt Romney and I both grew up in the heartland, real America, not the fake America like Chicago or California, and we know what places like Wisconsin and Michigan look like when times are good, when people are working, when families are doing more than just getting by. And not using welfare or unemployment?  And we both know it can be that way again.  
We’ve had very different careers – mine mainly in public service, his mostly in the private sector. He helped start businesses and turn around failing ones in some pretty sketchy ways. By the way, being successful in business – that’s a good thing. Right, just when Romney does it, it looks a lot like greed. 
Mitt has not only succeeded, but succeeded where others could not.  He turned around the Olympics at a time when a great institution was collapsing under the weight of bad management, overspending, and corruption – sounds familiar, doesn’t it?  
He was the Republican governor of a state where almost nine in ten legislators are Democrats, and yet he balanced the budget without raising taxes. Completely on his own...ignore previous statements on the executive branch taking credit for something they couldn't do on their own. Unemployment went down, household incomes went up, and Massachusetts, under Mitt Romney, saw its credit rating upgraded. 
Mitt and I also go to different churches.  But in any church, the best kind of preaching is done by example.  And I’ve been watching that example.  The man who will accept your nomination tomorrow is prayerful and faithful and honorable. Not only a defender of marriage, straight marriage, he offers an example of marriage at its best. Opposed to those bad marriages of poor people. Not only a fine businessman, he’s a fine man, worthy of leading this optimistic and good-hearted country.   
Our different faiths come together in the same moral creed.  We believe that in every life there is goodness; for every person, there is hope.  Each one of us was made for a reason, bearing the image and likeness of the Lord of Life.  Any atheists in the house? [crickets]
We have responsibilities, one to another – we do not each face the world alone.  And the greatest of all responsibilities, is that of the strong to protect the weak.  The truest measure of any society is how it treats those who cannot defend or care for themselves. 
Each of these great moral ideas is essential to democratic government – to the rule of law except regulations, to life in a humane and decent society unless you're female or gay.  They are the moral creed of our country, as powerful in our time, as on the day of America’s founding.  They are self-evident and unchanging, and sometimes, even presidents need reminding, that our rights come from nature and God, not from government.  Which is why women and gays don't get rights. But hey wasn't Jesus kind of into giving to the poor? Dirty commie. 
The founding generation secured those rights for us, and in every generation since, the best among us have defended our freedoms.  They are protecting us right now until we cut them.  We honor them and all our veterans, and we thank them unless they're gay, we're turning that shit around first chance we get
The right that makes all the difference now, is the right to choose our own leaders the same we've had before, white guys.  And you are entitled to the clearest possible choice, because the time for choosing is drawing near. God does this guy like his right to choose. So here is our pledge. 
We will not duck the tough issues, we will lead.  Like banning questions on abortion after that Akin thing. 
We will not spend four years blaming others, we will take responsibility.  By blaming the other guys for fear mongering and downgrading America. 
We will not try to replace our founding principles, we will reapply our founding principles. Like slavery. 
The work ahead will be hard.  These times demand the best of us – all of us, but we can do this.  Together, we can do this. As long as you are part of the "we".
We can get this country working again. Through exploiting labor. We can get this economy growing again.  We can make the safety net safe again. By punishing the poor and helping the "legitimate needy." We can and will do this.  
Whatever your political party, let’s come together for the sake of our country and our mutual fear of women, people of color, and gays.  Join Mitt Romney and me.  Let’s give this effort everything we have.  Let’s see this through all the way.  Let’s get this done. 
 Thank you, and God bless."



Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0812/80423.html#ixzz253ZGuFsS

Thursday, August 30, 2012

Ann Romney's Speech: Translated for the non-wealthy

I couldn't watch the Republican Convention. I'm not strong enough to hear that much garbage. I did hear about a interesting game: adding "except gay people" to the end of sentences during the various speeches. 

Ann Romney's transcript, red text was added by yours truly. 

The following is a speech that Ann Romney gave at the Republican National Convention on August 28, 2012.
ROMNEY:  Hello!  What a welcome.
   (APPLAUSE)
   Thank you.  And thank you, Luce. I cannot wait to see what we are going to all do together. This is going to be so exciting!
   (APPLAUSE)
   Just so you all know, the hurricane has hit landfall and I think we should take this moment and recognize that fellow Americans are in its path and just hope and pray that all remain safe and no life is lost and no property is lost.  So we should all be thankful for this great country and grateful for our first responders and all that keep us safe in this wonderful country.
   (APPLAUSE)
   Well, I want to talk to you tonight not about politics and not about party.  And while there are many important issues that we will hear discussed in this convention and throughout this campaign tonight, I want to talk to you from my heart about our hearts. Because who came to the convention of a political party to talk about politics? Anyway, I leave politics up to my husband. 
   (APPLAUSE)
   I want to talk about not what divides us, but what holds us together as an American family provided your white, wealth, and hetero or you don't belong.  I want to talk to you tonight about that one great thing that unites us, that one great thing that brings us our greatest joy when times are good and the deepest solace in our dark hours. Tonight, I want to talk to you about love between people who count.  I want to talk to you about the deep and abiding love I have for a man I met at a dance many years ago.  And the profound love I have and I know we share for this country.  I want to talk to you about that love so deep, only a mother can fathom it; mothers have this weird superpower called love they use it to fight crime.  The love that we have for our children and our children's children; men don't love their children?.   And I want us to think tonight about the love we share for those Americans, our brothers and our sisters, who are going through difficult times, whose days are never easy, nights are always long, and whose work never seems done; we should probably define work, what better place to put a welfare comment in about what counts as work and what doesn't in the eyes of people freaking out about the work requirements.   They're here among us tonight in this hall.  They are here in neighborhoods across Tampa and all across America.  The parents who lie awake at night, side by side, wondering how they will be able to pay the mortgage or make the rent, but try not to make eye contact with them.   The single dad who is working extra hours tonight so that his kids can buy some new clothes to go back to school, can take a school trip or play a sport so his kids can feel, you know, just like other kids, emphasis on "feel" because poor people are like others; poverty definitely isn't the norm for a large number of Americans.   And the working moms who love their jobs, but would like to work just a little less to spend more time with the kids, but that is just out of the question with this economy, anyone not employed in Ann's America?.   Or how about that couple who would like to have another child but wonder how they will afford it, but it isn't really their choice because you know women shouldn't have access to contraception or abortion or any control over their medical care?  I have been all across this country and I know a lot of you guys; I totally have black friends you guys.
   (APPLAUSE)
   And I have seen and heard stories of how hard it is to get ahead now emphasis on heard because I've never experiences it.  You know what?  I have heard your voices.  They have said to me, I am running in place and we just cannot get ahead.   Sometimes, I think that, late at night, if we were all silent for just a few moments and listened carefully, we could hear a collective sigh from the moms and dads across America who made it through another day, and know that they will make it through another one tomorrow again with these parents who can't get a break like ever. But in the end of that day moment, they are just aren't sure how.   And if you listen carefully, you'll hear the women sighing a little bit more than the men.  It's how it is, isn't it?  It's the moms who have always had to work a little harder to make everything right, but not because women are paid less or have more cultural restrictions.  It's the mom's of this nation, single, married, widowed, who really hold the country together.  We're the mothers.  We're the wives.  We're the grandmothers.  We're the big sisters.  We're the little sisters and we are the daughters. We are defined by our relationships to others, with our reproductive and marital capabilities prioritized.   You know it's true, don't you?
   (APPLAUSE)
   I love you, women!
   (APPLAUSE)
   And I hear your voices.  Those are my favorite fans down there.
   (APPLAUSE)
   You are the ones that have to do a little bit more and you know what it is like to earn a little bit harder earn the respect you deserve at work and then you come home to help with the book report just because it has to be done; again with the depicting women as having more barriers, but standing with the party who openly says this is untrue.   You know what those late-night phone calls with an elderly parent are like, and those long weekend drives just to see how they're doing.   You know the fastest route to the local emergency room and which doctors actually answers the phone call when you call at night, and by the way, I know all about that.   You know what it is like to sit in that graduation ceremony and wonder how it was that so many long days turned into years that went by so quickly; I'm confused do men not know these things? What about transparents?.  You are the best of America except the gays and poor.
   (APPLAUSE)
   You...
   (APPLAUSE)
   You are the hope of America.  There would not be an America without you.  Tonight, we salute you and sing your praises!
   (APPLAUSE)
   I am not sure if men really understand this, but I don't think there is a woman in America who really expects her life to be easy. In our own ways, we all know better, preach.  You know what, and that's fine, um, no. We don't want easy; like hell we don't.  But the last few years have been harder than they needed to be because there is a war on women, I'm contributing to.  It is all the little things, the price of the pump you could not believe and the grocery bills that just get bigger, all those things that used to be free, like school sports are now one more bill to pay and we're beating up on teachers, labor, and everyone else who would fight on your behalf.   It's all the little things become the big things.  And the big things, the good jobs, the chance at college for white people otherwise no college for you and the home you want to buy just get harder because of big banks and corporations exploiting you; they are some of Mittens best friends because they're people.  Everything has become harder. We're too smart and know that there are no easy answers, but we're not dumb enough to accept that there are not better answers.
   (APPLAUSE)
   And that is where this boy I met at a high school dance comes in. His name is Mitt Romney and you should really get to know him. Oh, my god, you guys. He's so cute. 
   (APPLAUSE)
   I could tell you why I fell in love with him; he was tall, laughed a lot.  He was nervous.  Girls like that.  It shows the guy's a little intimidated.  He was nice to my parents, but he was also really glad when they were not around.
   (LAUGHTER)
   I don't mind that.  But more than anything, he made me laugh. Some of you might not know this, but I am the granddaughter of a welsh coal miner. See I'm real people!
   (APPLAUSE)
   He was determined -- he was determined that his kids get out of the mines.  My dad got his first job when he was six years old in a little village in Wales called (inaudible). Cleaning bottles at the (inaudible).    When he was 15, dad came to America.  In our country, he saw hope and an opportunity to escape from poverty.  He moved to a small town in the great state of Michigan.
   (APPLAUSE)
   Michigan!
   (APPLAUSE)
   There he started a business, one he built by himself, by the way. 
   (APPLAUSE)
   He raised a family and he became mayor of our town.  My dad would often remind my brothers and me how fortunate we were to grow up anyplace like America.  He wanted us to have every opportunity that came with life in this country, and so he pushed us to be our best and give our all.  Inside the houses that line the streets in downtown, there were a lot of fathers teaching their sons and daughters those same values oh now its the fathers doing it.  I didn't know it at the time, but one of those dads was my future father-in-law, George Romney.
   (APPLAUSE)
   Mitt's dad never graduated from college.  Instead, he became a carpenter like Jesus.  He worked hard and then he became the head of the car company, and then the governor of Michigan.    When Mitt and I met and fell in love, we were determined not to let anything stand in a way of our future like poverty.  I was Episcopalian, he was a Mormon.  We were very young, both still in college.  There were many reasons to delay marriage.  And you know what, we just didn't care. We got married and moved into a basement apartment. Privilege to delay marriage if you want or to rush if you want. 
   (APPLAUSE)
   We walked to class together, shared the housekeeping, ate a lot of pasta and Tuna fish.  Our just was a door propped up on saw horses, our dining room table was a fold down ironing board in the kitchen. But those were the best days.   Then our first son came along.  All at once, a 22-years-old with a  baby and a husband, who's going to business school and law school at the same time, and I can tell you, probably like every other girl who finds herself in a new life far from family and friends with a new baby and a new husband, that it dawned on me that I had absolutely no idea what I was getting into. But with a family and support and Mittens' stock portfolio we survived. 
   (APPLAUSE)
   Well that was 42 years ago.  I survived.  We now have five sons and 18 beautiful grandchildren.
   (APPLAUSE)
   I am still in love with that boy that I met at a high school dance and he still makes me laugh.   I read somewhere that Mitt and I have a storybook marriage. Well, let me tell you something.  In the storybooks I read, there never were long, long rainy winter afternoons in a house with five boys screaming at once, this would really suck   (LAUGHTER)   and those storybooks never seemed to have chapter's called M.S. or breast cancer.  A storybook marriage?  Nope, not at all. Actually, most literature has a conflict, just saying.  What Mitt Romney and I have is a real marriage not a fake one like gay people who can't get married.
   (APPLAUSE)
   I know this good and decent man for what he is.  He's warm, and loving, and patient.  He has tried to live his life with a set of values centered on family, faith, and love of one fellow man.  From the time we were first married, I have seen him spend countless hours helping others .  I've seen him drop everything to help a friend in trouble, and been there when late-night calls of panic come from a member of our church whose child has been taken to the hospital.    You may not agree on Mitt's decisions on issues or his politics -- by the way Massachusetts is only 13 percent Republican, so it's not like it's a shock to me.
   (LAUGHTER)
   But -- but let me say this to every American who is thinking about who should be our next president.  No one will work harder.  No one will care more.  And no one will move heaven and earth like Mitt Romney to make this country a better place to live. For those he feels a connection to. 
   (APPLAUSE)
   It's true -- it's true that Mitt's been successful at each new challenge he has taken on wealthy white guys are like that.  You know what, it actually amazes me to see his history of success being attacked.  Are those really the values that made our country great?
   (AUDIENCE MEMBER):  No. Only if you deviate from the narrative, like a 16 year old black Olympian getting harassed for speaking out against racism. 
   ROMNEY:  As a mom of five boys, do we want to to raise our children to be afraid of success?
   (AUDIENCE MEMBER):  No. Only poor kids, who don't have the luxury to try something and fail, so they can't try something and succeed either. 
   ROMNEY:  Do we send our children out in the world with the advice try to do OK?
   (AUDIENCE MEMBER):  No. Once again only those who aren't privileged. 
   ROMNEY:  And let's be honest.  If the last four years had been more successful, do we really think there would be this attack on Mitt Romney's success?
   (AUDIENCE MEMBER):  No. Maybe we shouldn't have deregulated so many industries?
   ROMNEY:  Of course not.  Mitt would be the first to tell you that he is the most fortunate man in the world.  He had two loving parents who gave him strong values and taught him the value of work not like lazy poor people.  He had the chance to get the education his father never had.  But, as his partner on this amazing journey, I can tell you Mitt Romney was not handed success.  He built it and benefited from the privilege of his race, class, sexuality, gender, etc.
   (APPLAUSE)
   He stayed in Massachusetts after graduate school and got a job. I saw the long hours that started with that first job.  I was there when he had a small group of friends talking about starting a new company.  I was there when they struggled and wondered if the whole idea was just not going to work.  Mitt's reaction was to work harder and press on.   Today, the company has become another great American success story through exploiting labor.  Has it made those who started the company successful -- made them successful beyond their dreams?  Yes, it has.  It allowed us to give our sons a chance at good educations and made those long hours of the reports and homework worth every minute.  It's given us the deep satisfaction of being able to help others in ways that we could never have imagined.    This is important.  I want you to hear what I am going to say. Mitt does not like to talk about how he has helped others because he sees it as a privilege, not a political talking point. Humility? Help others, but not employees.
   (APPLAUSE)
   We are no different than the millions of Americans who quietly help their neighbors, their churches and their communities.  They don't do it so that others will think more of them.  They do it because there is no greater joy.  Give and it shall be given unto you. Oh, now I get the privilege comment, people of privilege have the time to do it. Then again, plenty of people do good works, but then they probably wouldn't mention it during a convention. 
   (APPLAUSE)
   But because this is America, that small company which grew has helped so many lead better lives, the jobs that grew from the risk they took have become college educations and first homes how did a company do all of this again? Or is Mittens a company, I think I'm on to something. I get the corporations are people comment: Mittens is a corporation and possibly a robot.  That success has helped scholarships, pensions and retirement funds all of which we advocate cutting.  This is the genius of America.  Dreams fulfilled, help others launch new dreams as long as you belong.
   (APPLAUSE)
   At every turn in his life, this man that I met at a high school dance has helped lift up others.  He did it with the Olympics when many wanted to give up.  He did it in Massachusetts where he guided the state from economic crisis to unemployment at just 4.7 percent. Under Mitt, Massachusetts' school for the best in the nation.  The best.
   (APPLAUSE)
   He started something that I really love.  He started the John and Abigail Adams scholarship which gives the top 25 percent of high- school graduates a four-year tuition-free scholarship.
   (APPLAUSE)
   This is the man America needs. Because he can bail out the country on his own?
   (APPLAUSE)
   This is a man who will wake up every day with the determination to solve the problems that others say cannot be solved, to fix what others say is beyond repair, this is the man who will work harder than anyone so that we can work a little less hard. Unless you're on welfare, then you have to work more.  I can't tell you what will happen over the next four years. But it may include slashing the social safety net, restricting women's rights, banning gay marriage, etc. But I can only stand here tonight as a wife and a mother and a grandmother, an American, and make you this solemn commitment.   This man will not fail his friends like corporations.
   (APPLAUSE)


Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/08/28/transcript-ann-romney-speech-at-republican-national-convention/#ixzz24z0vCCaF

Wednesday, August 29, 2012

Detroit Prosecutor Kicking Ass and Taking Names

Kym Worthy, a Detroit prosecutor, is leading the way to sort through more than 11,000 untested police "rape kits" since 2009. Worthy is determined to test the kits, log, and enter them into the national DNA database; the kits include evidence from the rapes including semen and saliva.

Worthy has had to fight hard to get to test the kits because of a lack of funding and to get the police department to care about the rapes in the first place. Worthy found out that thousands of kits were untested and just sitting in a warehouse. The chief of police wasn't interested in doing anything about the kits until someone inside his office leaked the information to the press:
"No one really paid attention to what I was saying and yelling about 'til about four months in," said Worthy. 
Worthy's team received a $1 million federal grant to start testing the kits once the public took notice. Naturally, the hard work paid off with the identification of 20 serial rapists from the first 153 kits tested this summer, and they found 38 other DNA matches. Worthy only has funds for 1,600 of the 11,404 rape kits.

Worthy is pretty impressive before all this: she is a single mother of three, the first African American and first woman to be Wayne County prosecutor, and she indicted former Detroit mayor Kwame Kilpatrick for perjury and obstruction of justice in 2009. Worthy was rape thirty years ago jogging around her apartment complex in law school. She didn't report it, and now wants to help those who do. She is developing a blueprint for other cities across the country.

Tuesday, August 28, 2012

GOP officially delusional

House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) has backed Mittens' assertion that President Obama is ending the welfare work requirements. Boehner and Mittens are claiming Obama is shoring up his base with some racist allusions.

As previously discussed, Mittens is trying to get the white guy vote by scaring the misinformed about welfare. He's claiming President Obama is rolling back work requirements. In an interview with USA Today, Mittens is quoted:
"There's no question in my mind that the president's action was calculated to...shore up his base."
Romney is employing a pretty old stereotype about black people and welfare. You get it, because black people are on welfare, and Obama is trying to get them to vote for him.

A Mittens' spokeswoman, Andrea Saul, claims Romney was referring to Obama's liberal base:
"President Obama's liberal base are the people who believe the same way he does: that government is the solution to everything."
This woman has the worst job in politics.

Boehner told HuffPo, why does this man speak to HuffPo, upon being asked if Mittens had gone too far:
"The president came out and announced that he was going to waive the work requirements that are outlined in the 1996 welfare reform bill. He's the one who said it. And those work requirements have in fact facilitated moving people from welfare to work....For the president to try to waive those work requirements, I think, it wrong for this country, and it's really wrong for those people on welfare who need training, who need skills, who need to get into the mainstream of American society. The premise of your question I think is women All I know is that he did it. Why would he do it, you know, 90 days, 85 days before the election? I'll let you answer that one."
Of course, as HuffPo points out 29 Republican governors, including Mittens, signed and sent a letter to HHS in 2005 asking Congress for similar waivers to the work requirement. Boehner went on to say that the Republicans have a chance because of the recession. Because you know, people of color who have a higher unemployment rate in a good year are going to want to vote for the millionaire ticket in a bad half decade.

Monday, August 27, 2012

Book Review: When She Woke

I've been trying to get this feminist book club off the ground for a few weeks. The first book on the list is When She Woke by Hillary Jordan. Personally, I was sold on this book after this Washington Post review. The Washington Post was not impressed by the novel mostly because the large amount of blame perceived to be placed on Christians, which is indicative of their lack of understanding of the novel. The most striking aspect of the novel is the way the main character questions her faith and the behavior of those around her, but also her own. How quickly decisions spiral out of control for the heroine. When considering the motto of the resistance movement in the novel, "It's personal," the reader must understand that the origins of the oppressive policies become less important than the choices of the main character. That it not to say they don't matter at all, but the emphasis is placed on the choices individuals make.

So a brief run down: distopian future where fundamentalist Christians have taken over in a states' rights kind of revolution following a superclap outbreak (a little poignant given the antibiotic resistant strain of gonorrhea recently in the news). They passed personhood on a massive scale when women were rendered infertile by the superclap; abortion is now prosecuted as murder. Additionally, budget constraints resulted in melachroming, a treatment which colors your skin depending on your crime along with other punishments, and then the criminals are leased they live as social pariahs. Our heroine, Hannah Payne (i.e. Hester Prynne) wakes up red, for murder, specifically abortion. Then the novel details her trials after her release from the Chrome facility. Violence, rape, and exploitation are daily fears for all the Chromes, but red females are rare, which makes them more of a target. Then there is a resistance movement to overthrow these restrictive laws with the motto, "It's personal." Which is similar to what Hannah told the police about the man who impregnated her and the doctor who performed her abortion.

The major themes are pretty straight forward feminist principles: 1. medical procedures and sexual history are personal, 2. the personal is political, and 3. regardless of crime violence is unacceptable. There are minor discussions of sexuality but not sexual orientation, instead discusses of sexuality focus more around the rights individuals have regarding their sexuality. The resistance movement resembles the underground railroad and is full of dangers. Actually, it is a very good depiction of how similar the vigilant movement and the resistance movements are and how they mirror the government's actions or in actions.

However, the little things what make this a good novel, particularly the seemingly insignificant things which have a huge impact on Hannah. For example, her mixed feelings on her first menstruation after her abortion, which signifies that the procedure was not only successful, but that she was still fertile. Then for her to remember that after being found guilty of an abortion/murder, she will never be permitted to be pregnant again. The humiliation Hannah feels at almost every step of the novel.

Jordan tells a quick paced story, perhaps she tries to cram too much into the novel. She draws largely from Hawthorne's The Scarlet Letter  and Atwood's Handmaid's Tale. I'm giving it a solid 4.5/5. Of course, I'm partial to the novels Jordan pulls from as well.

Friday, August 24, 2012

Is an abortion for any reason, just as valid? Yes

A new nationally representative study was released by the Guttmacher Institute finding that most women seeking abortions had experiences at least one "disruptive event" in the year prior to obtaining an abortion. This is the first study of its kind. Emily Douglas at the Nation provides a run down of the importance of this study and its relevance to the current abortion debates. The study author, Ann Moore, called these disruptions "social shocks" including moving multiple times, employment, separating from a partner, falling behind on rent/mortgage payments, partner incarceration, etc. Of course physical and sexual abuse are classified as disruptive events. The study even states:
“Women with abusive partners are substantially over-represented among abortion patients.” 
This shocks no one with a brain. The study also found that more than half of the women surveyed reported using contraception the month before becoming pregnant. This study corroborates previous studies claiming that sexual coercion plays a role in a significant number of pregnancies. Guttmacher found a link between intimate partner violence and unintended pregnancy. This requires further study; I'm hoping my friend's organization contributes to this. According to Moore:
“There are direct ways that violent partners, and nonviolent partners, can interfere with a women’s ability to prevent unintended pregnancy. There’s also a relation between the instability that comes with being in a violent relationship.”
Lynn Harris covered a series of studies a few years ago identifying "reproductive coercion." If you don't know what this is, take a feminist theory course, but essentially it is when women in abusive relationships are subjected to health risks such as pregnancy and STIs. This can include birth control sabotage.

All of this comes up now because of Rep. Akin's brilliant comments on how women should justify their rapes, abortions, and just about any other personal event others find morally objectionable. The whole idea here is that is a woman is legitimately raped, and she doesn't have a faith based abortion then she could obtain an abortion for any "legitimate" reason.

So the findings from Guttmacher talking about sexual coercion which could be read as a legitimate reason for abortions. But the reality is that it doesn't matter. As Maya Dusenbery on Feministing said:
You don’t know anything about other people’s livesThe point is to show that we can’t categorize abortions into these different types, because every single woman’s reason for getting an abortion is absolutely unique.
Understanding other people's abortions takes a kind of empathy most people lack, and it is far beyond the scope to categorize them. If we start who deserves an abortion and who doesn't; the worthy vs. the unworthy.

The attempts to understand more about why women obtain abortions reinforce the same power dynamics, which is that the public is entitled to know why women have abortions and have an opinion about her decision. Also, just because the public knows why a woman makes her decision doesn't mean that the public will understand and be more accepting of the decision.

At this point I'm wondering where the line is going to get drawn, which of course is women's reproductive health. Really, I just don't understand the interest in other people's medical procedures or prescriptions. I couldn't careless if half of Congress needs Viagra, but somehow it is every one's business how much women get charged for birth control or if they choose a legal medical procedure. The big lesson of the week is that the people trying to regulate women's bodies have no idea what they are talking about...possibly some of them have never seen a woman's body.

This link takes you to a pretty disturbing list of categories of rapes. It is supposed to draw your attention to the concept of legitimacy what counts and what doesn't. Let me ruin it for you, all of them are legitimate. However, when we start deciding what counts and what doesn't when discussing women's bodies, we strip them of control over themselves. What is a legitimate rape? A rape where the public deems it not the victims fault. What is a valid reason for an abortion? A legitimate rape. If the situation doesn't fit in these narrow terms then let the slut-shaming and legal restrictions begin.

Thursday, August 23, 2012

No accommodation for black voters in Ohio

No Blacks Allowed No accommodating black voters in Ohio according to Doug Priesse.

Mr. Priesse, an Ohio GOP election official, voted against the weekend voting rules that enables thousands to cast ballots in the 2008 election, said on Sunday that he didn't think that Ohio's early voting procedures should accommodate African-Americans. Explain yourself sir.
"I guess I really actually feel we shouldn’t contort the voting process to accommodate the urban -- read African-American -- voter-turnout machine. Let's be fair and reasonable."
Ohio Secretary of State Jon Husted, a Republican, ordered all 88 Ohio counties to allow early voting on Wednesday. Early voting will be Monday through Friday until 7 pm for the final two weeks before the election. Weekend voting will not be allowed.

Weekend voting helped 93,000 Ohioans vote in the final three days before the 2008 election. Black churches promoted voting on the Sunday before the election, which will not be possible if Husted's ruling stands. The Obama administration has sued to restore the final three days of early voting.

Early voters in 2008 in Cuyahoga (home!) and Franklin counties were disproportionately African-American. Northeast Ohio Voter Advocates released a study that found blacks accounted for 56 percent of all in-person early votes in Cuyahoga County and 26 percent of overall votes. Cleveland's racial make-up is 2-1 black according to the 2010 Census; I don't know the figures in Columbus off the top of my head. In Franklin County (Columbus), African-Americans cast 31 percent of early votes and 21 percent of overall votes.

Wednesday, August 22, 2012

Hands Off, Crazy

If this doesn't make you smile you have no soul. Look at these girls dance.



Raise the minimum wage and help women, who knew, oh right everyone

Some House Democrats are seeking to increase the minimum wage to $9.80 per hour in order to assist in shrinking the ever-increasing gap between the wealthiest Americans and the working class. This would be an increase from the $7.25 per hour that people are getting now. Also, to catch-up with inflation, the amount should be $10.55 per hour.

The Economic Policy Institute released a new report finding that raising the minimum wage to $9.80 would have a significant impact on 28 million low-income workers, and it would really benefit women. The report shows that women make up 54.5 percent of workers who would be affected by the potential increase. The report asserts that this makes it a "women's issue", but come on, what isn't?



Naturally, the impact on women varies based on state, and shockingly women in Mississippi look to benefit the most. In Mississippi 64.4 percent of low-wage workers are women and would benefit. In California and Nevada 49.3 percent of low-wage workers are women standing to benefit. These two states are the only ones where women are not the majority benefiting from the potential increase.

Conservatives, continuing their stance that women aren't people, are opposed to raising the minimum wage using the same old arguments. Should we given them anything for consistency? The good old, raising the minimum wage will kill jobs and hurt small businesses. Of course these things called studies show that raising the minimum wage does not impede job growth because most of the countries minimum wage employees work for huge corporations. But studies sound like science, and we know conservatives only pull that out when they want to pretend they know how to talk about women.

The graphic from Think Progress.

Tuesday, August 21, 2012

GOP Platform without the rape exception

The GOP has renewed its official platform support for a "human life amendment" to the Constitution, which it does every presidential election season. Of course this time around, they have to endure Rep. Todd Akin's inability to speak in public and Mittens making promises. We all know "Legitimate Rape Guy" forcing those white guys forced Romney/Ryan to do some damage control by pledging that abortion would be legal in the case of rape under a Romney administration.

However, according to CNN, they nabbed a copy of the GOP's draft platform, which doesn't include an exception for rape, incest, life of the mother, Immaculate Conception, or faith based abortion, which needs to be a thing. Romney will stand behind this platform when he accepts the Republican nomination next week. Bad news for Mittens.

So this "human life amendment" is basically personhood, which you know how I feel about all that. The draft written yesterday still needs to be approved by the full platform committee today (Tuesday) and by delegates to the Republican National Convention next week. So will Romney try to change the language? Maybe, but when McCain tried Tony Perkins, the president of the Family Research Council, told McCain it would be political suicide. Of course that turned out to be the least of McCain's problems.

Mittens making promises you probably can't keep. Sad Face.

Wal-Mart settles with the DOL


Wal-Mart has agreed to settle with the U.S. Department of Labor for the amount of $4.8 million on charges that Wal-Mart misclassified employees working at vision centers in the retail stores. Wal-Mart labeled them managers to exempt them from the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), and Wal-Mart could then refuse to pay these employees overtime when they worked more than 40 house a week. Well played Wal-Mart.

Additionally, Wal-mart will pay back overtime wages to 4,500 employees and must pay $463,815 in civil penalties for the repeated FLSA violations.

Fun fact, calling employees managers doesn't make them exempt under FLSA. Your attorney must review the exempt/nonexempt classifications to ensure FLSA compliance if your organization's managers perform the same tasks as other employees do.

And here I thought Wal-Mart knew all the ways to beat the system and exploit their workers.

Monday, August 20, 2012

Legitimate Rape: I'm not really sure what this is or how it is different from "conventional rape"

Ok, to say I'm getting tired of rape culture is an understatement, but given the weekend I've had, read this page at your own risk.

Let's begin with Rep. Todd Akin, or as I'm going to call him till he leaves loses the Missouri Senate seat, the Legitimate Rape Guy. Apparently, this guy believes a woman's body will involuntarily miscarry if she is raped legitimately raped. To say I don't understand this phrase is just the beginning. I've asked friends, with a dear friend of mine winning the definition vote with a simple: "sad face."

The best part of this thing is that Akin thinks this is backed up by science. Yep, a Republican pulling out the word science without knowing what it means. Akins says:
"First of all, from what I understand from doctors [pregnancy from rape] is really rare. If it's a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down."
Sciences and magic. Because even if this magical miscarriage didn't happen, Akin doesn't believe abortion should be legal. Oh My God you guys, can we call this a faith based abortion?

After shit hit the fan over the weekend, Akin dialed it back releasing the following statement:
"In reviewing my off-the-cuff remarks, it's clear that I misspoke in this interview and it does not reflect the feel empathy I hold for the thousands of women who are raped and abused every year. Those who perpetrate these crimes are the lowest of the low in our society and their victims will have no stronger advocate in the Senate to help ensure they have the justice they deserve."
Of course, we can assume these thousands of women meet the requirements for "legitimate rape." Fuck this guy. Really, this guy sucks.

Sen. Claire McCaskill, is running against Akin for Sentate, and was losing by a margin of 41.3 to 49.7 percent. Naturally, she was "stunned" by Akin's stance and statement (nice calling it a stance).

I'm with Jezebel, I'm angry with this guy, but not shocked. How can we be shocked? These people hate women. They don't understand sexual assault, and they don't want to. Akin voted for an anti-marital rape law...seriously. He wants the word "forcible" to be included in definitions of rape.

We need to prevent people like this from taking office. We need to be clear: Rape is rape. Legitimate rape, gray rape, etc are all terms to hurt victims.

Ok, so now for the personal story from over the weekend.

We've all played wingman for a friend where you must engage a kind lame person so your friend can get somewhere with the person they are interested in. So I'm trying to get this guy to talk to me while my friend is with his friend. All cool. I deal with the conservativeness and "I work on the Hill." I go directly to sports do not pass go. I can talk sports with anyone but a Ravens or Heat fan. After a painful conversation on baseball, yes, painful.

We talk Olympics.

And Kobe Bryant.

And I make a Kobe is a rapist joke. I know the Judge dismissed the charges against Kobe; I know the civil suit between Kobe and his accuser is sealed. Apparently, in Texas, Kobe won. And he won because his accuser is a slut.

What the what? This isn't where I drew the metaphorical line in the sand. I listened to him mansplain welfare to me...wrap your mind around that. There is no winning here. We'll never know exactly what happened in that hotel room, but come on. At this point in the evening I couldn't fake it anymore, and I called it a relatively early night. But in what world do you explain to a woman 1. how to do her job and 2. that the accuser was to blame for a possible sexual assault. I imagine even women sympathetic to Kobe might be a little wary of chatting up a guy who is immediately opposed to victims. I don't know, I hear warning bells, maybe that's just me. There obviously was no hotel room in our future. Of course after Kobe, I continued this conversation until it was dead. I had to know more. Please, sir, tell me more about how to do my job because no one could possibly be this dense. I can admit when I'm wrong. And I'm wrong, some people are very dense.

Friday, August 17, 2012

Chile's Department of Labor calls out Starbucks and Wal-Mart over labor practices

Last week Chile's Department of Labor blacklisted Starbucks and Wal-Mart for their local labor practices. 

Chile blacklisted 36 companies over labor practices. Starbucks was fined $25,000 for discriminating against unions and bad faith in collective bargaining negotiations. The supermarket chain, Hipermercados Lider, owned by Wal-Mart, was fined $4,167 for not paying replacement worker bonuses. Starbucks and Wal-Mart are repeat offenders; Starbucks have been charged the highest fine by the courts for a second time. 

Starbucks spokesman, Jim Olson, claims the company has not had Chilean government contracts in the past and does not plan to have them, so they don't see any impact on business. Olson responded to questions about the company's reputation with:
We're proud of the work environment we've created. He added the company "recognizes and respects" its employees rights to belong to unions.
Wal-Mart was not available for comment, shocking I know. Starbucks had their first strike at a company-owned store, with the Chilean workers seeking pay that keeps up with inflation, a $100 monthly lunch stipend, and other benefits. Workers claim to have abandoned the strike without reaching an agreement with the company. 

Thursday, August 16, 2012

Movie Review: Ruby Sparks

Ok, so part of me really liked this movie, but that is the part of me who makes the worst decisions ever with men. On an intellectual level this movie has some seriously troubling themes.

Ruby Sparks is a Zoe Kazan film about a troubled novelist and the woman he creates. The hero, Calvin, seems fairly likable in the beginning if you like disaffected creative types who have been convinced of their own brilliance only to question it later in life. He's a best selling author who hasn't been able to write a second novel, which in the publishing world is very bad. So he write about his dream girl, literally, the girl from his dreams. Enter Ruby. She is a manic pixie dream girl, a painter, free spirit, etc. Everything he writes she does...So being the lover of fiction I am, this is interesting to me. Now time for the conflict: Ruby doesn't know she is a character and is actually a person with feelings and desires.

This is where we hate Calvin. No really, this guy doesn't deserve Ruby, or anyone. He feels like he can own her, that she belongs to him, and only him. He literally can make her to anything and does. All the while recognizing this is problematic, and that he shouldn't write her anymore. During this conflict we find out about Calvin's old girlfriend, a novelist. Apparently, these relationship issues are nothing new including that he was controlling of her as well.

Zoe Kazan is brilliant; she owes some scenes, and I wanted nothing more than to comfort this girl in a manipulative relationship with a guy, when she doesn't know it. Also, given that it was written by Kazan, I may be more forgiving of some of the themes. Because while watching the film, I thought who hasn't wanted to control their partner sometimes? And in the film we see the negative effects of actually getting to control and change another person. Perhaps this was supposed to be a narrative on the nature of relationships between men and women when you think you can change other people and make them into someone else? But the ending undoes that. I'm left wondering if there are consequences for abusing others just because you can. Also, there is a weird discussion that because Calvin created Ruby he has a right to her. It is really very disturbing. Regardless, my friend and I were not pleased with the ending.

3/5 for poorly constructing relationships and letting the bad guys win.