Monday, September 30, 2013

Cleveland, we're winning



It has been rough. We can’t get a break and every time national attention is on us it is because some new kind of terrible is happening. But yes, in on Sunday, we win. And not just win, but seriously win.

The Cleveland Indians (yep, hate the name) won their tenth game in a row on Sunday getting them the AL Wild Card spot. They beat the Twins 5 to 1. They will play the Rays or the Rangers on Wednesday in the Wild Card game. It is all pretty crazy given Terry Francona is leading a “group of ruffians and no-names.” Come on Cleveland.  

Full disclosure, I don’t care much for baseball. I pull for the Indians because CLEVELAND, but I don’t watch  close or follow stats. But it is hard not to be swept up in it (see what I did there with the sweep reference ? *brushes shoulders off*).

But what about football? The sport I actually love? We’re winning. I know! I’m shocked too. We beat the Bengals like red-headed stepchildren (17 to 6). We’re tied with the Ravens and the Bengals for first place in AFC North. We traded Trent Richardson to the Colts for the first round draft pick. So everyone thought we’re not going to do much and once again hedge our bets for next season, but no. Backup quarterback Brian Hoyer has led us to victory in both games since the trade. The article linked concludes with this “All in all, a pretty nice little Sunday for Cleveland. Browns win, Indians claim a playoff spot, and LeBron James didn’t win any game that we know about. Go on Cleveland.”

*Self high-five*

There is water on Mars



I’m geeking out! I mean we know intelligent life isn’t going to ever contact humans because we’re weird…think about how most people drink milk from cows. Most animals don’t drink milk post infancy, and we drink the milk produced by another animal. It is weird. We’re also real violent, and I doubt intelligent life would want to be involved in conflict in the Middle East.

 

About 2% of the soil on Mars is water. I KNOW! That is all. I have nothing else. I’m just excited that there is water on Mars. 

 

 

Friday, September 27, 2013

Partisan hacks, all of them



You know how you can tell elected Republicans don’t give a damn about women’s health? They try to repeal Obamacare, and then to generate points with their base after yet another failure they decide to trot out anti-choice attachments. FUCK YOU.

Of course, shit like this is why I believe we need the Senate. Every chance these misogynists get they pass/or try to pass some kind of restrictions on my health care. Just a reminder that is what abortion is a health care decision for female born individuals.

This was all over Twitter yesterday, and of course the Huffington Post had it. House Republicans (probably those beholden to the Tea Party) have argues that a ban on late-term abortions should be included in a bill to authorize a one-year increase of the debt ceiling. This comes a few weeks before the Treasuring Department expects the US will run out of money to fund its obligations, but that’s according to the Washington Post, so lies.

Remember back to June when the House of Representatives pass a ban like this one, but the Senate didn’t even vote on the measure, and the White House threatened to veto it for good measure? Yeah, so now they think they can hold everyone hostage. Also, the Huffington Post reports that according to the CBO a ban like this would increase the debt. *slow clap*

The House GOP also wants to back the Keystone pipeline and delay Obamacare in this one as well. Also apparently, they are considering demanding provisions that back Wall Street banks, expanded drilling, and healthcare and social services cuts for raising the debt ceiling. Democrats and President Obama have refused to negotiate over the debt ceiling increase, but we know how the Dems are, and hostage negotiator Obama.  Also, fun fact: Speaker Boehner wasn’t immediately available for comment…hear those drums John? They are coming for you.

I’m no fan of the Senate, but as long as these zealots are owning the House then we need them and all their inefficiencies to protect us from the fanatic policies being cranked out of the House.

Thursday, September 26, 2013

I'll probably never make you a sandwich




Ok, that isn’t true. I made so many sandwiches for the homeless, so, so, many. Deli meat grosses me out so hard. I’m not much for cooking, but when I lived with M and C, and then again with M and B, we had roomie date night. We’d watch television and take turns being responsible for dinner. Often, I picked up takeout. My friend K is concerned I would starve to death without being walking distance from Chipotle because I don’t think it is worth the time to cook for myself, mostly because that is a lot of time for something only me, one person is going to eat. Some people like cooking, but I’m not one of them.

That stupid joke about “make me a sandwich” that is tossed at feminists all the time has taken a dark turn. Stephanie Smith wrote an article called, “I’m 124 sandwiches away from an engagement ring” for the New York Post. So who is Smith? Well, she’s making some waves in the foodie community because she keeps a blog called 300 sandwiches, and she is a reporter for the New York Post. The blog is beautiful, she photographs carefully constructed sandwiches.

So what is my problem? Am I opposed to sandwiches? Well, a little bit because I’m a feminist killjoy, and clearly sandwiches are the tool of the patriarchy. Just kidding. But like I said the “man me a sandwich” joke took a dark turn:

“My boyfriend, Eric, is the gourmet cook in our relationship, but he’d always want me to make him a sandwich.
“Each morning, he would ask, ‘Honey, how long you have been awake?’
“’About 15 minutes,’ I’d reply.
“’You’ve been up for 15 minutes and you haven’t made me a sandwich?’
“To him, sandwiches are like kisses or hugs. Or sex. ‘Sandwiches are love,’ he says. ‘Especially when you make them. You can’t get a sandwich with love from the deli.’
“one lazy summer afternoon just over a year ago, I finally gave in. I assembled turkey and Swiss on toasted wheat bread. I spread Dijon mustard generously on both bread slices, and I made sure the lettuce was perfectly in line with the neatly stacked turkey slices.
“Eric devour the sandwich as it if were a five-star mean, diving in with large, eager bites. ‘Babes, this is delicious!’ he exclaimed.
“As he finished that last bite, he made an unexpected declaration of how much he loved me and that sandwich, ‘Honey, you’re 300 sandwiches away from an engagement right!’”

 Yep, that’s all it takes ladies. Now, Smith goes on to explain their relationship has often centered around food. They met at a restaurant, and frequently their dates involved Eric cooking for her. She also describes her feelings on marriage, and how after they began cohabiting, she wondered how long it would take to get engaged. I know some men read this blog, and yes, moving in with someone regardless of the logical reasoning, implies you want to and will marry that person. I know it isn’t fair, and you may not have discussed it, but it is assumed. Obviously, she is in favor of marriage:

“Maybe I needed to show him I could cook to prove that I am wife material. If he wanted 300 sandwiches, I’d give him 300 sandwiches—and I’d blog about it.”

 Smith talks about some of the initial push back about how chauvinist this all sounds, and I’d argue is, but we’ll get there. She decided to focus on quality instead of quantity of sandwich with her initial thoughts focusing on being engaged as soon as possible. She now focuses on how cooking is something she and Eric do together, essentially bringing them together. She also notes that Eric always says thank you (how big of him). Eric had this to say:

“’You women real all these magazines to get advice on how to keep a man, and it’s so easy,’ he says. “‘We’re not complex. Just do something nice for us. Like make a sandwich.’”

 So do I think people shouldn’t do nice things for their partners? Absolutely not, but this isn’t a nice thing. Maybe it has turned into a nice thing because they are bonding and all that, but it was demand placed on her by him because of socially constructed gender roles. The end game is an engagement that’s what she wants; she doesn’t want to do this because it is nice. And sure, maybe they are bonding and all that crap, but the title of this article references the engagement ring. So maybe the priority hasn’t changed that much? Also, the assertion that being a good wife requires being able to cook it antiquated. You know what makes someone “wife material” being willing to take on that role and title. And what makes someone a good partner? Being supportive, burden sharing, and loving. Because marriages are partnerships, and while my contractual stance may put some people off, it is still a partnership and each side should contribute to the collective good.

I can’t say that you should commit to someone because you love them and want to spend an indefinite amount of time together. Everyone is different and knows what works for them. I shocked many a friend this year when I changed my stance on indefinite cohabitation, who’s to say I won’t change my mind on marriage at some point? M enjoyed a good laugh about it when she was in, and then we had one of those awkward conversations about adulthood and life. As a coworkers said this morning, “I never wanted to get married till I met someone I couldn’t live without.” But I can say, getting married because it is on the checklist or because you want to get kids in under the biological wire is a bad reason. Changing yourself for a person is also a bad idea.

All I got from the article, besides how ridiculous this is, was that Eric is demanding, makes broad generalizations about women and gender, and doesn’t see much value in marriage. After all it is worth a few sandwiches. I wouldn’t agree to cohabit with someone unless I was sure he’d be supportive of me and actually nice to me (I have so many dating issues). This is not a man I’d want in my life. Smith seems easily bullied, and while this whole thing might make her very famous, wouldn’t it suck if all this ended in a divorce? The sandwich isn’t an unreasonable demand, and it isn't what is wrong here. The expectation that Smith was up for a whole 15 minutes without making him her priority is a demand and truly creepy. That is what this is about by the way, she is supposed to make him her priority, and I didn’t see anywhere in the article how Eric is making Smith his priority.  I give zero fucks if you cook for your partner, stay at home with your kids, or change your last name. I care if your partner refuses to be with you for any of those things or any variety of other things.

Wednesday, September 25, 2013

So as Sen. Ted Cruz stands on the Senate floor talking, but not filibustering, federal workers prepare to strike.



I give exactly zero fucks about Sen. Cruz’s last stand against Obamacare…until the next one. When I first read about it on Tuesday, I thought it was a joke, and that it is. However, on my way home from work and before I began working on my super awesome fall project, I read this little number by my dream boyfriend Josh Eidelson, or as I’m sure he prefers, professional journalist.

According to Eidelson, cleaning and concessions workers in federal buildings are protesting their taxpayer funded jobs with poverty wages. They are marching on the White House today. They will demand President Obama use executive authority to raise labor standards for their job. The organizers expect a larger than the initial walk out back in May.

Delano Wingfield will strike for the third time today, and feels the federal government should take responsibility because they own the building where he makes only $9 per hour. The group Good Jobs Nation, backed by the SEIU, organized the walk out back in May. Instead of targeting the companies that employ the workers, they are targeting the federal government whose agreements and contracts facilitate the laborers’ work.

The labor movement is employing two tiered responses to the oppression through one day walkouts/strikes and targeting the “real bosses” who facilitate the oppression. Good Jobs Nation hasn’t laid out a specific play for Obama.

The estimate is that about 2 million workers make $12 per hour or less, while doing jobs funded by taxpayers. The walkout last May attracted the attention of some Democrats who wrote to President Obama in July to take action.

The protest today includes plans for: a morning march with members of Congress, a prayer vigil, an attempt to deliver a letter to the White House, and a press conference. The strike will include workers from Union Station (owned by Department of Transportation), Smithsonian Museums (owned by the federal Smithsonian Institution), and the Ronald Reagan Building and Old Post Office (owned by the General Services Administration).

The workers allege that their employers do not pay a living way and some have committed wage theft.  Good Jobs Nation also alleges workers face illegal punishments for past involvement in strikes. These allegations have triggered an investigation by the Department of Labor over wage theft. Workers met with GSA administration Dan Tangherlini, which asked the agency to audit all the contracts for potential wage theft. The workers believe GSA is unlikely to assist them.

Alright, keep an eye out, and DC peeps support the workers obviously. I miss living in DC.