Showing posts with label Stay-at-home moms. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Stay-at-home moms. Show all posts

Monday, May 13, 2013

Stay-at-home moms and low-wage labor



Jezebel and NBC News have pieces on motherhood and stay at home moms. I imagine this has something to do with mothers’ day over the weekend, no?

There are roughly 5 million stay-at-home moms in the US. The NBC article asserts that conventional wisdom says stay-at-home moms can afford not to work, but experts are now countering that idea. Instead stay-at-home moms are unable to find work and then decide to stay home. Stephanie Coontz, a professor of history and family studies at The Evergreen State College in Olympia, Washington and co-chair of the Council on Contemporary Families says, “They [mothers] just don’t think they have enough education and skill…where their pay would cover their child care, transportation and clothes.”

This is a compelling point. For those of you unaware, the costs of having a child are rising quickly, and there is a new assertion that the rising costs might be why more and more women are indifferent to having children. Regardless, daycare can run in the hundreds of dollars a week.

The articles both state that while there are plenty of middle class, college educated women staying at home with their children, there have been several studies conducted in recent years which found that less-educated moms who live in lower-income households are more likely to stay home with the kids then more-educated moms or those in households with higher incomes. An analysis of government data on married mothers between 25 and 54, prepared for the Council on Contemporary Families found that women whose husbands were in the lowest 25% of the male earnings distribution were most likely to stay at home full-time.

The second most likely group of stay-at-home moms are in the top 5 % of the economic spectrum. Paula England, a sociology professor at New York University found in her recent research that more-educated moms are more likely to be employed because they can obtain employment that pay well enough to make it worth the economic investment. England says, “Women who can’t get good jobs anyhow—maybe not enough to cover their child care costs or maybe not worth it in meaning—are the ones who are more likely to, if they have a husband, make the calculation (to stay home). It really is kind of the opposite of what a lot of people believe.”

England noted that there is a small portion of stay-at-home moms with very high-earning husbands, but most often, the better job a mom can get the more likely she is to be employed. A Gallup analysis of 45,000 adult women from last year found that 75% of college-educated women with kids under 18 were working compared to the 48% of moms with a high school degree. Gallup also found that 77% of moms with household incomes of $90,000 or more were working, compared to 45% of moms with household incomes less than $24,000.

Rose Kreider, chief of the Fertility and Family Statistics Branch for the US Census Bureau, says her research also suggests that instead of an “opt out revolution” of highly educated married moms wanting to leave the workforce, many moms are younger, less educated, Hispanic and/or caring for very young children could be left out because their employment options are all low-wage and not enough to cover child care costs.

A Pew Research Center report from March found that 32% of moms with children under 18 think the ideal situation is to work full-time, and 47% said they would like to work part-time. Additionally, 20% said they would prefer not to work.

I’m not interested in the mommy wars or the feminist baiting with the whole feminists are hypocrites for staying at home with their kids. This feels like the first time we’re actually engaging how class impacts the decision to stay home with your children or work. The conversation may start to include discussions of low-wage labor that doesn’t cover child care costs.