Showing posts with label ANSIRH. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ANSIRH. Show all posts

Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Abortion not the root of all evil for women after all



So what exactly do we know about abortion? Not much. No really, it is understudied. Many studies have questionable validity connecting abortion to mental illness and drug use. Politicians often use these studies to limit women’s reproductive rights. And I was worried about what I’d do without the election. 

There is obviously no interest in the effects of turning women away who come for abortions because of restrictive rules. Because you know they live happily ever after with their spawn. Oh wait, they probably end up on welfare. 

Well, now there is. The women have been dubbed “turnaways,” and a new longitudinal study shows what happens to these women in terms of their economic position, health, and relationship status after seeking an abortion and being denied.

The study, put together by public health researchers with the UC San Francisco group, Advancing New Standards in Public Health (ANSIRH), used data from 956 women who sought abortions at 30 different abortion clinics around the US. 182 of the women were turned away. Diana Foster Greene, lead researcher followed and interviewed the women, and their variety of abortion experiences. For some the abortion was obtained easily, for some it was a struggle, and some were denied. Two weeks ago, the research group presented their findings from the five-year study to the Public Health Association Conference in San Francisco. 

So what did they find?

“We have found that there are no mental health consequences of abortion compared to carrying an unwanted pregnancy to term. There are other interesting findings: even later abortion is safer than childbirth and women who carried an unwanted pregnancy to term are three times more likely than women who receive an abortion to be below the poverty level two years later.”

 IO9 called Diane Foster Greene for more details, which are broken down below:

·         Poverty
o   Women the Turnaway Study were in comparable economic positions at the time they sought abortions.
o   In the Turnaway group, 45% were on public assistance and 2/3 had household incomes below the federal poverty line. Finances were one of the many reasons an abortion was sought.
o   86% of the women denied were living with their babies within a year.
o   11% had given them up for adoption.
o   At one year later, 76% of turnaways were on public assistance compared to 44% of those who had abortions.
o   At one year, 67% of the turnaways were below the poverty level (vs. 56% of the women who received abortions).
o   If a woman is denied an abortion she is more likely to be unemployed, on public assistance, and live below the poverty line. 

·         Violence and Drug Use
o   There was no significant differences in drug use between women who have abortions and those who don’t.
o   There is appears to be no correlation between drug abuse and abortion.
o   Drug users who couldn’t get abortions were more likely to give their child up for adoption.
o   Turnaways were more likely to stay in a violent relationship with an abuse partner. One year after being turned away 7% reported incidents of domestic violence in the previous six months. 3% of women who had abortions reported domestic violence during the same time.
o   Abortions allowed women to get out of these relationships with greater ease. So women who get abortions have a dropoff in domestic violence.
o   So having an abortion facilitates women getting out of violent relationship. There is no connection between abortion and drug use. 

·         Emotions
o   97% of women who had an abortion felt they made the right decision after one week.
o   65% of turnaways wished they had an abortion one week after they had been turned away.
o   After one week, turnaways said they had more feelings of anxiety than women who had abortions.
o   90% of the women who had abortions felt relieved though many felt guilty as well.
o   Later there were no differences in anxiety or depression between the two groups.
o   There were no indication that there were lasting harmful negative emotions associated with getting abortions.
o   Turnaways were more stressed.
o   Nothing translated into clinical depression. Abortion and depression are not linked in the five year study; they will be following up for longer effects. 

·         Physical and Mental Health
o   Turnaways faced greater health risks from giving birth. Even late stage abortions are safer than giving birth. Researchers said, “We find physical health complications are more common and severe following birth (38% experience limited activity, average 10 days) compared to abortion (24% limited activity, average 2.7 days). There were no severe complications after abortion; after birth complications included seizures, fractured pelvis, infection and hemorrhage. We fine no differences in chronic health conditions at 1 week or one year after seeking abortion.”
o   One option when looking at the data includes the idea of making abortions more accessible to lower long-term costs. Abortion access can lead to women being healthier with better economic outlooks.
o   Restricting access leads to women and their children living in poverty and potentially at risk for harm from domestic violence.

The Turnaway Study was funded entirely through donations. So you get all that? Abortions can lead to healthy productive lives without relying on public assistance or being forced to stay with violent partners. Of course, if we’re thinking women are human incubators who’s offspring are entitled to a life of poverty then I guess the anti-choice people are right.