Showing posts with label io9.com. Show all posts
Showing posts with label io9.com. Show all posts

Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Abortion not the root of all evil for women after all



So what exactly do we know about abortion? Not much. No really, it is understudied. Many studies have questionable validity connecting abortion to mental illness and drug use. Politicians often use these studies to limit women’s reproductive rights. And I was worried about what I’d do without the election. 

There is obviously no interest in the effects of turning women away who come for abortions because of restrictive rules. Because you know they live happily ever after with their spawn. Oh wait, they probably end up on welfare. 

Well, now there is. The women have been dubbed “turnaways,” and a new longitudinal study shows what happens to these women in terms of their economic position, health, and relationship status after seeking an abortion and being denied.

The study, put together by public health researchers with the UC San Francisco group, Advancing New Standards in Public Health (ANSIRH), used data from 956 women who sought abortions at 30 different abortion clinics around the US. 182 of the women were turned away. Diana Foster Greene, lead researcher followed and interviewed the women, and their variety of abortion experiences. For some the abortion was obtained easily, for some it was a struggle, and some were denied. Two weeks ago, the research group presented their findings from the five-year study to the Public Health Association Conference in San Francisco. 

So what did they find?

“We have found that there are no mental health consequences of abortion compared to carrying an unwanted pregnancy to term. There are other interesting findings: even later abortion is safer than childbirth and women who carried an unwanted pregnancy to term are three times more likely than women who receive an abortion to be below the poverty level two years later.”

 IO9 called Diane Foster Greene for more details, which are broken down below:

·         Poverty
o   Women the Turnaway Study were in comparable economic positions at the time they sought abortions.
o   In the Turnaway group, 45% were on public assistance and 2/3 had household incomes below the federal poverty line. Finances were one of the many reasons an abortion was sought.
o   86% of the women denied were living with their babies within a year.
o   11% had given them up for adoption.
o   At one year later, 76% of turnaways were on public assistance compared to 44% of those who had abortions.
o   At one year, 67% of the turnaways were below the poverty level (vs. 56% of the women who received abortions).
o   If a woman is denied an abortion she is more likely to be unemployed, on public assistance, and live below the poverty line. 

·         Violence and Drug Use
o   There was no significant differences in drug use between women who have abortions and those who don’t.
o   There is appears to be no correlation between drug abuse and abortion.
o   Drug users who couldn’t get abortions were more likely to give their child up for adoption.
o   Turnaways were more likely to stay in a violent relationship with an abuse partner. One year after being turned away 7% reported incidents of domestic violence in the previous six months. 3% of women who had abortions reported domestic violence during the same time.
o   Abortions allowed women to get out of these relationships with greater ease. So women who get abortions have a dropoff in domestic violence.
o   So having an abortion facilitates women getting out of violent relationship. There is no connection between abortion and drug use. 

·         Emotions
o   97% of women who had an abortion felt they made the right decision after one week.
o   65% of turnaways wished they had an abortion one week after they had been turned away.
o   After one week, turnaways said they had more feelings of anxiety than women who had abortions.
o   90% of the women who had abortions felt relieved though many felt guilty as well.
o   Later there were no differences in anxiety or depression between the two groups.
o   There were no indication that there were lasting harmful negative emotions associated with getting abortions.
o   Turnaways were more stressed.
o   Nothing translated into clinical depression. Abortion and depression are not linked in the five year study; they will be following up for longer effects. 

·         Physical and Mental Health
o   Turnaways faced greater health risks from giving birth. Even late stage abortions are safer than giving birth. Researchers said, “We find physical health complications are more common and severe following birth (38% experience limited activity, average 10 days) compared to abortion (24% limited activity, average 2.7 days). There were no severe complications after abortion; after birth complications included seizures, fractured pelvis, infection and hemorrhage. We fine no differences in chronic health conditions at 1 week or one year after seeking abortion.”
o   One option when looking at the data includes the idea of making abortions more accessible to lower long-term costs. Abortion access can lead to women being healthier with better economic outlooks.
o   Restricting access leads to women and their children living in poverty and potentially at risk for harm from domestic violence.

The Turnaway Study was funded entirely through donations. So you get all that? Abortions can lead to healthy productive lives without relying on public assistance or being forced to stay with violent partners. Of course, if we’re thinking women are human incubators who’s offspring are entitled to a life of poverty then I guess the anti-choice people are right.

Friday, May 20, 2011

Vampire Apocalypse: Averted

As many of you know I'm very afraid of a vampire apocalypse. Not because I fear the undead (who has two thumbs and is totes ready for a zombie apocalypse? This girl), but rather I fear Edward Cullen. I like my monsters ready to kill and feed on me, not creepy stalkers that manipulate you into violent relationships.

Regardless, there has been a discovery of a specific bacteria that prevents the spreading malaria. So this bacteria kills off any mosquitoes infected preventing the mosquito from infecting people. So a break down: the Anopheles Gambiae is the malaria carrying mosquito. This mosquito has been killing people for a very long time (and as John Stewart pointed out mosquito net money probably was used as bail money for former leader of the IMF, Strauss-Kahn). According to io9.com, researchers are operating with two plans to combat malaria:
  1. Malaria proof mosquitoes
  2. Shooting mosquitoes with lasers (sure its a joke, but what about when the Skrulls descend? I think we should keep working on this)
So a little more about this magical bacteria that kills malaria carrying mosquitoes?

Wolbachia is a bacteria that preys on insects. It is not carried by the type of mosquito that carries the malaria parasite. Scientists guessed that it might be fatal to this type of mosquito, and infected them with two different strains of Wolbachia, hoping for a way to kill off the carriers to stop the spread of the disease. The bacteria spread quickly, and even seemed to manipulate the mosquitos' immune systems to give itself the run of the insect's body. What's more, it inhibited the growth of malaria in the insects. But they didn't seem to die. They sucked down the sugar that the scientists provided them quite happily, and lived quite healthily. Then they were fed blood, and died in a day.

Not only does this bacteria seem like a good way or reducing the amount of mosquitos that feed on blood, it actively prevents a mosquito from dining on infected blood, and then moving on and infecting another person. This could be a good way to keep the spread of malaria under control.

So as far as I'm concerned this is great, and no not because of all the lives it will save, but because now we have a solution against vampires. Now back to looking for a cure for werewolves.

Monday, August 16, 2010

Comic University: Love It!







These were posted by Chase Mitchell on CollegeHumor.com. I love this, some more than others. For example my favorite is the first image of Wonder Woman and Superman. Just something a little feel good. Especially sense there is a new study out saying comic heroes are detrimental to boys. The article was picked up by io9.com, who I usually love, but the author of the post seems to have taken offense to the idea that boys are being badly shaped by comic heroes. I'm not really sold on the whole pop culture ruins everyone. What I think the comic industry does need to recognize is the overly sexual images of women and lack of development of female characters. This isn't always the case; characters like Wonder Woman exists and Rogue enjoy a huge story arch in X-men Legacy. But like the Twilight series women have a history of playing support roles to further their male counterparts.

Regardless, fun pictures!