Showing posts with label Columbus Dispatch. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Columbus Dispatch. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 10, 2013

Because some of you think you’re funny…



Cleveland sports, I don’t know how to describe being a fan of a Cleveland sports team. It is like waking up every morning and knowing it can’t get any worse, except then it does. That constant and consistent disappointment. A favorite saying in Cleveland is “snatching defeat from victory since 1964.” And it is true. Sometimes we get so close only to fail anyway. I call it character building. There are few things/people/situations that can disappoint me more than Cleveland sports.

In true Cleveland style, Scott E. Entsminger wrote his own obituary before his death on July 4. Being a Cleveland fan, he knew to take one last shot at the Browns. The obituary, published by the Columbus Dispatch, reads “A lifelong Cleveland Browns fan and season ticket holder, he also wrote a song each year and sent it to the Cleveland Browns as well as offering other advice on how to run the team. He respectfully requests six Cleveland Brown pall bearers so the Browns can let him down one last time.”

Alright, that’s awesome. I can’t even pretend to be mad…though, I still think the gents who posted this to Twitter were just trolling Cleveland. We’re allowed to troll ourselves; it is part of being fans of the team.

The family requested people paying their respects to Entsminger wear Cleveland Browns clothing in his honor.

I’ll even give it to CBS Sports for this line on the whole thing, “Oh, Browns. You even managed to get beat by the deceased.” Truer words haven’t been spoken.

I wanted to write about something silly and fun(nish) during a week of what I’m sure will be a terrible, awful, no good week. I’m looking at you Texas and North Carolina. Below is a photo that I think sums things up well.


I suggest watching both videos below because they are pretty great. Mike Polk's letter to the Browns:


And the epic fan rant: "Factory of Sadness."



We'll do this again next year.

Tuesday, March 26, 2013

Ohio, now with less hating gay people



Let me begin by saying, this is why I don’t travel. I shouldn’t be allowed to go further from my front door than what I can drive within eight hours. I was back in the DC area Sunday night/Monday morning, but opted to stay in bed all day Monday. Paid Sick Leave, bitches.

According to the Columbus Dispatch’s Tom Dodge, Ohioan’s views on gay marriage have changed. This poll is particularly interesting as the US Supreme Court hears Prop 8. I guess it was a good thing Ohio passed restrictive anti-gay laws back when I was in undergrad in 2004. Dodged a bullet there.

We passed a constitutional amendment defining marriage as between a man and women, which passed with 62% of the vote. Now, however, 54% back a new amendment to repeal the 2004 ban, which “allow[s] two consenting adults to marry, regardless of their gender.”

The argument is that the electorate in Ohio has changed; shifting to reflect more young people who are cool with gay marriage. Naturally, there are still people in Ohio worrying about how gay marriage will destroy their faith (these people are probably in the closet and think once gay marriage is legal they will be compelled to marry people of the same gender). The article interviewed a woman working on behalf of gay marriage and a religious zealot, who it was hard to even pretend to take seriously, after all her argument was based in what the Bible says is ok and not ok. Personally, I like my blended fabric, but I am after all a heathen.

Three-fourths of Ohioans under 35 years-old are in favor of gay marriage. The poll was conducted by cellphones and land lines by Saperstein Associates of 1,003 adults who were randomly selected from March 5 to 10 and has a margin of error of plus or minus 3.1 percentage points. The results were weighted to reflect the population, and the response rate was about 28%, which is a shitty response rate, but expected given it was a phone poll. The poll was financed by The Dispatch. They support the American Association for Public Opinion Research’s transparency initiative.

Friday, March 8, 2013

Dollar Dollar Bills: JobsOhio and two audits



We’re equal opportunity in Ohio, Republicans, Democrats, whatever you’re calling yourselves. We’ll investigate you.

Now, what is Gov. John Kasich up to? Well he’s stealing from the tax payers of Ohio, but apparently his financial records for JobsOhio are being subpoenaed as well. State Auditor Dave Yost issued the subpoena Wednesday. Joe Hallett wrote about this for the Columbus Dispatch. This came after Kasich’s privatized economic-development agency failed to turn them over. Yep, privatization, one of my favorite things, between misogyny and cancer. Yost asserts the legal right to review the financials of the private entity that is attempting to attract jobs to Ohio, saying, “They are not cooperating with our attempts to audit them.”

The subpoena asks for all the financial records through the fiscal year ending June 30, 2012 and gives them until Wednesday to comply. JobsOhio was created in early 2011, shortly after Kasich became governor. JobOhio is a private nonprofit corporation that assumed the economic-development and job-creation functions of the Ohio Department of Development, now the Development Services Agency (some are just calling it a slush fund for Kasich), with the legislature earmarking $1 million for the startup costs, but last week a private audit revealed JobsOhio received $5.3 million in state grants that hadn’t been disclosed.

All of this comes after questions about how much taxpayer money has been put into JobsOhio and how it got there without state lawmakers knowing. Yost issued the subpoena after months of attempted negotiation between his office and JobsOhio’s chief financial officer Kevin Giangola. Yost said, “it became clear over the last three days or so that we weren’t going to hear back from JobsOhio.”

Shocking. Yost continues by saying, “I was told that the CFO said it wasn’t going to be his decision.”

I wonder who made this decision. Yost said it was unclear as to whether the decision was made by the governor’s office, but said he heard “third-hand through the legislative process” that Kasich’s admin might try to get an amendment into the state transportation bill to clarify his authority to audit JobOhio.

Rob Nichols, Kasich’s spokesman, indicated that the administration had no problem with Yost auditing taxpayer money going to JobsOhio, but he wasn’t clear on Yost’s purview and authority regarding the private entity: “The auditor has clear authority to audit public funds, and if there’s any confusion about that authority, then it needs to be clarified in law. [The Development Services Agency] is requesting that the auditor audit the public funds it has provided to JobsOhio and the administration looks forward to working with him on that effort.”

Senate President Keith Faber (R-Celina) said that “there has been discussion” about clarifying the auditor’s authority to check the financials of JobsOhio, but he didn’t see “any language on that.” State Sen. Gayle Manning (R-North Ridgeville), chair-woman of the Senate Transportation Committee, corroborated this. Because in Ohio, that's what we do if your job description is a bit fuzzy, we'll clarify it in an amendment and prevent you from doing your job.

Yost’s subpoena could trigger a court battle over the use of public funds for private purposes (yes, please) between heavyweight Ohio Republicans: Yost and Kasich. Yost said, “I was (Delaware County) prosecutor for eight years, and among the people I prosecuted were people of my own party. Duty brooks no friendship.”

When asked about whether JobsOhio’s refusal to provide financials rouses suspicion, Yost said, “My job is to follow the dollars and facts and go where they lead, and that’s what I’m going to do. We all want job creation, but I have to do my job.”

Yost asserted that JobsOhio officials said, “JobsOhio is a private corporation and the auditor of the state doesn’t belong in there.”

Yost said, “We simple have a disagreement about the law as well as a policy disagreement. If it turns out the law limits the ability of the auditor to examine the finances of that organization, then the law needs to be changed.”

At this point things are still unclear as to what authority Yost has. In January, Yost sent a letter to the chairman of the House committee saying his office had “clear and unambiguous” authority to examine the financials. He cited state law, which gives the auditor the ability to “audit the accounts of private institutions, associations, boards, and corporations receiving public money for their use and may require for them annual reports in such form as the auditor of the state prescribes.”

Yost continues in the letter, “To put it simply, the auditor of the state’s authority follows public money wherever it flows—including private entities.”

No one disagreed with the letter when it was read into record. Several GOP lawmakers were surprised when the private audit was reported on Tuesday. Rep. John Patrick Caney called for a state audit, “The secretive nature surrounding the use of these tax dollars is extremely alarming. I support the mission of JobsOhio, but they can’t just haphazardly prop up operations with public funds.

A spokesperson for JobsOhio didn’t respond to the Columbus Dispatch for comment.