Showing posts with label Target. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Target. Show all posts

Friday, February 1, 2013

Et tu, Target?



Just kidding, we all know Target is awful like Walmart, well not exactly like Walmart. Walmart is a special brand of sinister, but Target is really trying. Josh Eidelson, my dream boyfriend, wrote about Target locking employees in their stores overnight for The Nation.

Twenty-five workers filed OSHA charges last week against Target in the Twin Cities alleging they were regularly locked in the stores overnight.

But Target? Don’t hipsters shop there? I know, I do too because they are the not-Walmart of the stores that have everything you could ever think of needing.

Three of the janitorial contractors named in the OSHA complaints are Carlson Building Maintenance, Prestige Maintenance USA, and Diversified Maintenance Systems. Three of the janitorial contractors named in the OSHA complaints are Carlson Building Maintenance, Prestige Maintenance USA, and Diversified Maintenance Systems. The Minnesota labor group, Centro de Trabajoadores Unidos en la Lucha (CTUL) are organizing the workers. In an email to Eidedson, Target spokesperson, Molly Snyder said the company hadn’t been informed of an OSHA complaint, “At Target, we are committed to maintaining the highest standards of ethical business practices and we expect our vendors to do the same. We take allegations of inappropriate working conditions seriously and complete a thorough external audit of every housekeeping vendor on an annual basis.”

The cleaning staff are employed by Target’s contractors, but the CTUL alleges that Target management was aware of the staff being locked in the stores overnight. According to the workers, there was usually one manager onsite during his shift, and that manager was an employee of Target not the contractors.

Spokesperson Snyder was asked about the corporate policy regarding workers being locked inside of stores overnight and said, “All individuals who are in Target stores after hours receive information on Target’s standard safety protocol which includes the locations and use of clearly marked fire exits and doors, which allow them to exit the building anytime.” However, employees claim they never received this information.

Phil Toomey, Prestige’s outside general counsel, didn’t comment on the OSHA charges because he hadn’t seen them. When asked about the company policy on locking workers in stores, he responded, “ It’s practice at Prestige to comply with federal and state law. They don’t own the building.” The other two maintenance contractors declined to comment.

Target is the US’s second largest discount retailer after Walmart, but many labor organizers have alleged that both companies squeeze labor costs in similar ways and both are vehemently opposed to unions. Walmart faced charges similar to this back in 2004 for locking employees in their stores overnight. Target is entirely non-union in the US. UFCW filed a union election in 2011 at a Target in Long Island, but lost after an anti-union campaign, and the union alleges illegal threats and bribes by management.

The OSHA complaints are one aspect of the CTUL’s campaign to improve working conditions for retail cleaning workers in Minneapolis and St. Paul.

I know Target is lame, and I’ve known for a while. I also know in a lot of ways they are just like Walmart. Alright, Target, we’re over. It will be interesting to see how this turns out and if it has any long lasting effects on the way retail maintenance staff is treated.  There could be serious ramifications for Target and Walmart if employees of contractors can file charges against them for unfair practices because the protection these contractors provide these major corporations are the reason their hire them in the first place.

Tuesday, June 21, 2011

Target workers don't need union protections

They're just going to walk it off. Workers at a Target in New York voted down putting in a union in a 137 to 85 vote. This happened last Friday and hurts the pro-union campaigns currently underway.

According to the UFCW (United Food and Commercial Workers' Union), this was a result from the illegal intimidation by Target management that made the workers too frightened to vote in favor regardless of their feelings on unions. UFCW is calling on the National Labor Relations Board to investigate Target and maybe mandate a new election.

This was the first attempt to unionize inside Target in two decades. No Target has a union representative.

It is alleged that Target's victory came through intimidation methods such as pamphlets, video, and public states; these all pretty much reiterated the same anti-union sentiments we've heard before. The union comes in takes your money and you get nothing.

One of the women interviewed in the article on HuffPo discussed her pay being around $20,000 and that she receives food stamps, but her pay is fine. Additionally, she can look out for herself. Unions not necessary.

The organizers claim the problem stems from not being able to get their message out on store property, which of course the company can (thanks Supreme Court). The organizers rely on home visits.

Seriously, I've tried to overlook some things because Target is awesome. But between the anti-gay political donations and now the blatant union busting, I will no longer go near a Target. Essentially, Target is Wal-Mart for hipsters, and no more I say. I'll buy sweatshop made clothes somewhere else. Jesus, why did I ever shop here?