I can’t even with these people. Honestly, when you write something like
this, do no alarm bells go off indicating you sound like an asshat? Well, let
me help you out, if you ever feel the need to write anything defending men
engaging in pick-up artistry, you are an asshat. If this compels you to compare
rape to rejection, you’re definitely an asshat. And if you think for one second
that not “getting a girlfriend” i.e. ownership and possession of another person
is an affront to you because you are owed this much just for being a special
little snowflake, you are in fact the largest asshat.
So what exactly am I talking about, well Sam de Brito wrote an article
called “Hating
the search for love.” Let’s use a flight of fancy and pretend that is what
men who engage in this sort of behavior are doing, which we know isn’t true
based on the techniques which encourage men to treat women like objects, and
the phrase search for love implies giving and receiving, which objects can’t by
definition do. But let’s pretend. Sam graciously agrees that men like Julien
Blanc are creeps because he doesn’t respect women. However, then he argues that
the “scenes on the Yarra River in Melbourne” (where a protest took place over
Blanc and his followers) were mean. *tiny violin* See there is at least one
incident of violence at the protest, but let me be clear, most of what I read
was protesters yelling about rape culture and “walk of shame” as the men exited
the boat. I was called a bitch with my sister when we were walking home from
school at 13 or 14 for ignoring grown ass men yelling sexually explicit things at
us. Sorry your feelings were hurt boys, but grow a pair and walk that shit off.
Women do it all the time, where the threat of violence is very real. So you
know, hug it out and move the fuck on. You are after all endorsing a man who
regularly assaults people and video tapes it. Consequences of your actions,
aren’t they fine.
Sam argues that because he has attended a variety of PUA seminars over
the years as a journalist, he knows that they range from men like Blanc to
speakers who want to “improve their client’s lives and do so in a respectful
manner.” I wonder if Sam is talking about respecting their clients alone or if
that extends to their client’s prey remember these seminars often use that terminology.
This is the point in the article where Sam writes a swan song about how
hard it is to be one of the guys attending this seminar. He lists off every
possibility like minority, disabled, etc. to make you sympathetic, closing with the line “Imagine you turned up
at last week’s event with that mindset and had people screaming ‘creep’, ‘loser’
or ‘abuser’ at you and they were filming it?” Um, well, golly gee, I might not
be endorsing a man who assaults women or I would expect a backlash. I expect to
be called a baby killer, cunt, d**e, etc. every time I wear my “This is what a
feminist looks like” t-shirt, and no one was harmed by my fair trade t-shirt. I
know, but Kari, how can these guys be expected to be accountable for how they
spend their money and who they endorse? Oh, you mean like everyone else? *side
eye*
Sam points out, well these poor guys aren’t the real bad guys invoking
the whole women only date jerks meme—citing religious zealots, athletes, the
wealth, etc. Because nerds can’t hurt women they just can’t except with the fake
geek girl meme, or at cons, or in videogames, or in STEM or, well it looks like
there is quite a list of where nerds are capable of hurting and exploiting
women.
But it gets better, or so much worse depending on the lens you’re using
to read Sam’s piece because, “My point is, the demand of seminars such as the one
Blanc teaches arises from a very simple fact of life; the dating game is an
uneven playing field.” Oh? Do go on. *rubs hands together like a Batman villain*
You can see the car wreck coming for this guy.
“Men and women suffer and benefit from different sides to it.“No man goes out of a night worried he might be raped, sexually abused or catcalled and these are all serious instances of aberrant male behavior that we must address, punish or discourage as a society.“The flipside of this is your average man can go out every Friday and Saturday night for five years, buy himself a drink and stand at a bar and NEVER have a woman start up a conversation with him.“In the majority of social situations, men have to be instigators and, of course, there are a plethora of respectful, non-threatening ways to do this.“Some women, however, are quite happy to overlook, diminish and outright mock the problem this poses for many, many men—the anxiety of approaching women, the fear of rejection, the despair at being completely ignored by the opposite sex.“This is an experience 100 percent guaranteed for 95 percent of guys. It happens. Over and over and over again. And some guys need help to deal with being invisible.“I’m not equating the fear of rejection to the fear of being raped, merely pointing out that men—like most of the ones that attend Blanc’s seminars—do not do it to learn how to manipulate women, to sexually assault them or degrade them.“They do it to get a girlfriend, to have someone to hold, to find love.”
I know, where to begin? Yes, please tell me about how dating hurts women.
Are you going to address the social economic inequities that lead to a power differential
between potential partners? What about the new study that says men are happy
when their women partners fail? You know, the politics of dating. Oh, no, of
course not because the only thing women have to think about on dates is whether
this dude is going to rape me. Well, yeah that is there. Dating is actually
dangerous for women (see all the
domestic violence and stalking stats). But you’re right Sam, this isn’t about
women, why have we been talking about them this long? Back to the dudes. Poor,
poor dudes who are ignored and rejected because no one deserves that unless
your poor, a person of color, a woman, gay—who never show up in this piece at
all—oh, wait you see what I did right there.
Sam’s swan song here is all about how men are owed attention because…well
privilege, but Sam never says that. I fear rejection too gents, let’s bond over
it. I fear being rejected purely because being a man is more desirable in the
workforce (research, academia, writing, etc.) unless we’re talking low-wage
service work (and try being a person of color in the workforce). Now, as for my
personal life, I implement a take them or leave them approach. I have a firm
you can seek me out when you want to deal with me or don’t, your choice, your
right approach. See, because I’m a grown up, and I know that I don’t have the right to
other people’s time, space, or thoughts.
The piece closes in truly shortsighted fashion with language that implies
ownership over your partner. I hate the implication that you have to track and
trap a partner and then ze will be yours for always and you can all him squish…sorry,
I went all Finding Nemo. Women aren’t
pets gents; we don’t need you to feed us and walk us.
What Sam never explains is why these men deserve special treatment. These
men shouldn’t be yelled at for bankrolling an abuser because… These men should
possess girlfriends if they want them because… These men shouldn’t be treated
like women or other marginalized groups being yelled at on the street when they
are just trying to get to an obligation because… Because men have male privilege,
and we can’t go and treat them like women or other marginalized groups. Repeat after
men: I am not entitled another person’s time or space regardless of what
society tells me. Repeat this until you believe it, and then maybe I’ll buy you
a drink.
