Showing posts with label Romney Ryan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Romney Ryan. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 2, 2012

Ohio registers low-income masses


Poor people in Ohio have registered to vote in mass numbers because of the enforcement of law. This makes me so happy. I can’t even put it into words. This news, the ruling in favor of early voting, and the masses organizing around preventing voter ID laws makes me almost giddy. The Toledo Blade published an article on the newly registered voters. I know people have mixed feelings on voting and specifically voting in national elections, which I've heard from a disturbingly large number of people this election cycle.

I’m a big supporter of voting, and for me it comes down to a conversation I had with my mother as a child. I know it is cliché and sentimental, but she told me that it didn’t matter if she voted or not because it just didn’t matter. Not that voting didn’t matter because the two-party system is broken or the Electoral College, but that her vote specifically didn’t matter, and it wasn’t worth potentially missing an hour at work or rushing around between picking her kids. She essentially told me she didn’t matter; her life didn’t matter. Poor people who work in factories and live in low-income neighborhoods don’t matter. That we’re all supposed to be silent and happy with what those in power give us. I would be an adult before I witnessed her vote, and that was only because she really wanted to vote for a woman in a presidential race once in her lifetime, and being a lifelong Democrat she voted in the 2008 Democratic Primary for Hilary Clinton. To my knowledge this would be the second time ever she cast a ballot.

This conversation was echoed by the women I interviewed when conducting my thesis research, though I never asked specifically about politics there were many who wanted to talk about voting, advocacy, and the general sense of helplessness they feel when it comes to government, police, and “the system”. The overwhelming feeling was that President Obama failed them in a way, and they had their hopes up because they were finally being represented. Now, President Obama is not a single welfare mother. They are not the same, but the idea that someone in power might understand and empathize with them was inspiring for this population. This was reinforced in my years volunteering with the poor and homeless in Cleveland. We registered people to vote to give them some semblance of a voice, to make them feel as though they mattered, even in a broken system. There are more complexities here of course, but this is the simplistic summary.

Listening to adults, when you still feel so much like a kid,  tell you that they have no voice and nothing will ever change because they genuinely believe they do not matter and how there are treated is of no consequence is so sad, and they teach this to their children. Listening to a woman tell you that she tells her son not to advocate for himself because as a black man, he could be killed for standing up to the police makes you want to slam your head against a wall, but she is right. Voting can be the first step these populations can take to find their voices. They can matter even for just a second. Voting is the manifestation of citizenship, and the people I’m referring to here are rarely treated or perceived as citizens. I spent a lot of time in grad school discussing how to measure citizenship, and the general conclusion is that people in power decide who are and who are not citizens. and voting is one of the measures. When voting, even if it is just an act of theater, everyone (but the homeless and felons) are citizens for a moment. And that feeling in that moment can be so powerful.

So we can disagree about voting and the power of voting. For me, even if the system is broken empowering people to make themselves known matters. But the concept that 500,000 low-income individuals have registered to vote in Ohio is amazing.

Neither, Obama or Romney have spent too much time courting these potential voters, but looks like that may have been a mistake. Mostly both Obama and Romney have discussed the middle class, which I’m pretty sure is some phantom concept to either of them. So who registered these voters? Ohio’s county Job and Family Services offices (JFS) facilitate benefits such as welfare, food stamps, and Medicaid, and not where you can register to vote.

Of course we don’t know how many of these newly registered voters will actually vote, but it is incredible anyway. So how did this happen? The registrations came out of changes because of a federal lawsuit from 2009.

The lawsuit argues that there were widespread violations of the federal National Voter Registration Act, the part of the law that requires public assistance agencies to provide voter registration opportunities to clients. The 1993 law is also referred to as the “Motor Voter” act because it allows states to register people to vote when they renew their drivers’ licenses.

The lawsuit was filed in 2006, when random visits to JFS offices alleged that offices in several counties had no voter-registration forms on hand. Also, only 3 in 103 individuals were asked if they wanted to register to vote. From 2002-2004, 10 county JFS offices didn’t register anyone to vote. 17 other counties registered less than 10 voters. Other findings? Well, looks like offices dealing with rural small populations registered more voters than urban areas with larger populations with more people living in conjunction with the poverty line (the article says nothing about the potential racial implications here, but there is one). The JFS offices process about 4.7 million requests for assistance they only processed voter-applications for 1.5 percent of that number between 2003-2004.

The lawsuit was filed by ACORN, remember those bastards trying to help poor people? Naturally, it drew fire from Republicans, and then fell apart because of the video-sting scandal. Part of the lawsuit settlement in 2009 included an agreement that the Ohio Department of Jobs and Family Services would incorporate voter registration materials into the application for food, cash, and medical assistance. Of course voting is optional; Ohio isn’t making poor people register to vote. County agencies are required to send completed voter registrations to their county board of elections and report the total number to the Ohio Department monthly. This is a huge jump in the last few years:
“State data shows 191,237 registrations through county JFS offices in 2010; 195,560 registrations in 2011; and 125,597 this year through the end of August.”
These are not all new registrations but updating their information. There is no way to know how many new voters there are. However, the estimates look like less than two-thousand voters were registered a month, and now it is closer to sixteen thousand according to Lisa Danetz, senior counsel with Demos, a liberal policy and advocacy organization.

We know low-income individuals vote at a lower rate than the general population.
“The further down [in income] you go the less likely you are to vote,” said Stephen Brookes, associate director of the Ray C Bliss institute of Applied Politics at the University of Akron. “If you register because you are getting you [driver’s] license, there’s no guarantee that 10 months later when the election rolls around, you’ll care to vote.”
Voter registration in Ohio ends October 9th. A mere eight days away. So get on this, Ohioans. Early voting begins on Tuesday.

So, in conclusion and amidst a personal rant, vote because most people reading this haven’t really been told that they are insignificant. And while, I envy the idea that you can choose not to vote because of a crisis of conscience (for example: you oppose voting for the lesser of two-evils), not everyone can be so idealistic. I wish there was a candidate that is so great, but I don’t believe anyone is without flaw, so I’ll always have to choose between evils or not participant at all. Which leaves me back in ’92, with my mom telling me about how she isn’t important for her vote to matter.

Tuesday, September 25, 2012

Mitt Romney believes poor people should just go to the ER when sick.

Mitt Romney is arguing that the poor should just go to the ER when ill because that's a good idea. Also, the actual quote is more along the lines of, "At least we didn't let them die." Romney pretty much calls the ER a substitute for insurance. This was on Huffington Post this morning with video, and I couldn't resist.

So anecdotal, I worked in an ER processing intake while in undergrad during the graveyard shift. I can tell you, ER doctors, nurses, and staff do not believe the ER should substitute for insurance, and often the uninsured or those on Medicaid were treated poorly. I could tell you about how staff would make the uninsured and underinsured wait for hours before taking them. Not everyone mind you, but a lot of the people on staff were resentful of those who weren't insured.

Romney's quote:
"Well, we do provide for people who don't have insurance. If someone has a heart attack, they don't sit in their apartment and die. We pick them up in an ambulance, and take them to the hospital, and give them care. And different states have different ways of providing for that care."
First, Romney's selective amnesia strikes again; he has no memory of his universal health care law in Massachusetts.

When asked whether he believed in universal health care, Romney responded, "Oh, sure." I think the question was poorly phrased. Universal health care isn't like believing in God. Universal health care exists. He continued to say:
"Look, it doesn't make a lot of sense for us to have millions and millions of people who have no health insurance and yet who can go to the emergency room and get entirely free care for which they have no responsibility, particularly if they are people who have sufficient means to pay their own way."
Actually, Mittens, going to the emergency room isn't completely free. It contributes to the system that increases insurance premiums for all of us.

Romney also asserts that states have their own way of doing things:
"Again, different states have different ways of doing that. Some provide that care through clinics. Some provide the care through emergency rooms. In my state, we found a solution that worked for my state. But I wouldn't take what we did in Massachusetts and say to Texas, 'You've got to take the Massachusetts model.'"
Just to be clear, Romney's home state, which is the example he uses, has universal health care, but the rest of us shouldn't have that. We should use the more costly ER method.




Wednesday, September 19, 2012

Republicans, Officially Legislating Things that Haven’t Happened


Republicans are moving to prevent President Obama from making changes to welfare, which is just a way to provide Romney with a little ground after Obama received a bounce from the DNC and bully the President into following the rules.

Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) and Rep. Dave Camp (R-Mich), chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, revealed resolutions on Monday that show disapproval with the DHHS recommendation that states should be able to obtain waivers to make changes to the welfare to work requirements. If it passed the Obama administration would be unable to grant these waivers.

The welfare work waivers have been an issue since July, when DHHS made its announcement via memo and the Romney camp jumped on it. There is a pretty awful ad featuring President Obama destroying welfare work requirements while propagating the myth that welfare recipients are lazy and unwilling to work. Of course these waivers are actually an attempt by the Obama administration to appease governors who have requested such waivers including at least two Republicans from Utah and Nevada.

Former president Clinton has come to Obama’s defense stating the Romney ad was wrong. Additionally, The Washington Post Fact Checker, Glenn Kessler, pointed out the ad is wrong because it asserts President Obama has already moved to “drop work requirements” which isn’t true because no waivers have been granted.

Naturally, GOP lawmakers are also upset that DHHS had the audacity to make a rule change without consulting Congress. The Government Accountability Office said that administration needed to seek congressional approval before making policy changes, which makes sense.

Of course instead of framing the argument as the Obama administration should consult Congress before making policy change, the GOP lawmakers are jumping on Obama is gutting welfare:
“With the stroke of a pen, the Obama Administration single-handedly undermined one of the central tents of bipartisan welfare reform, that work is the best path to self-sufficiency. Given GAO’s findings, it’s an indisputable fact that this administration should have submitted its unilateral changes to Congress. The way forward is to put a stop to this unprecedented power play, as this resolution does, and start over on a robust reform and reexamination of this program,” said Hatch.
Camp added to this by calling it “unfortunate, but not surprising” that the Obama administration would overreach and not withdraw the change. Camp then continues to talk up welfare reform and the work requirements as the save all for poor people.

The House and Senate have restrictive timetables for voting so it is unclear whether they will vote on this before the election. Democrats are calling foul on all of this because it is based in lies. Also, Rep. Sander Levin (D-Mich), ranking member on the House Ways and Means Committee, pointed out that the root of these claims are pretty racist. Republicans are grasping at stereotypes that welfare recipients are lazy and if not required to work will not work, which isn’t what the evidence supports. But they’re not really the party of facts right now. 

Friday, August 31, 2012

Paul Ryan's RNC Speech through my lens

Again I couldn't watch this crazy. Apparently, Paul Ryan brought the crazy and the lies. Same rules as last time, red was added by me. Let the fiction begin:


The GOP Vice Presidential nominee Rep. Paul Ryan's convention speech, as prepared for delivery.

"Mr. Chairman, delegates, and fellow citizens: I am honored by the support of this convention for vice president of the United States. 

I accept the calling of my generation to give our children the America that was given to us, with opportunity for the young and security for the old – and I know that we are ready to cut social security.  I accept the duty to help lead our nation out of a jobs crisis and back to prosperity – and I know we can do this. 
Our nominee is sure ready. His whole life has prepared him for this moment – to meet serious challenges in a serious way, without excuses and idle words.  After four years of getting the run-around, America needs a turnaround, and the man for the job is Governor Mitt Romney. 
I’m the newcomer to the campaign, so let me share a first impression.  I have never seen opponents so silent about their record, and so desperate to keep their power.  
They’ve run out of ideas.  Their moment came and went. Fear and division are all they’ve got left and this from a party who knows fear: for further reference see the War on Terror.    
With all their attack ads, the president is just throwing away money – and he’s pretty experienced at that on unending wars...wait wrong President, but you know.  You see, some people can’t be dragged down by the usual cheap tactics, because their ability, character, and plain decency are so obvious – and ladies and gentlemen, that is Mitt Romney.   
For my part, your nomination is an unexpected turn.  It certainly came as news to my family, and I’d like you to meet them: My wife Janna, our daughter Liza, and our boys Charlie and Sam.  
The kids are happy to see their grandma, who lives in Florida.  There she is – my Mom, Betty.  
My Dad, a small-town lawyer, was also named Paul.  Until we lost him when I was 16, he was a gentle presence in my life.  I like to think he’d be proud of me and my sister and brothers, because I’m sure proud of him and of where I come from, Janesville, Wisconsin.  I'm just like you! Not a career politician at all.    
I live on the same block where I grew up.  We belong to the same parish where I was baptized.  Janesville is that kind of place. 
The people of Wisconsin have been good to me.  I’ve tried to live up to their trust.  And now I ask those hardworking men and women, and millions like them across America, to join our cause and get this country working again. By disbanding unions and stripping them of rights. You know what will really turn this country around? A return to sweatshop labor. 
When Governor Romney asked me to join the ticket, I said, “Let’s get this done” – and that is exactly, what we’re going to do.  By stripping women, minorities, LGBTQ individuals, and anyone else we don't like of rights. 
President Barack Obama came to office during an economic crisis, as he has reminded us a time or two.  Those were very tough days, and any fair measure of his record has to take that into account.  My home state voted for President Obama. When he talked about change, many people liked the sound of it, especially in Janesville, where we were about to lose a major factory.  
A lot of guys I went to high school with worked at that GM plant. Right there at that plant, candidate Obama said: “I believe that if our government is there to support you … this plant will be here for another hundred years.”  That’s what he said in 2008. 
Well, as it turned out, that plant didn’t last another year.  It is locked up and empty to this day. Lie. This plant was closed while G.W. was president.  And that’s how it is in so many towns today, where the recovery that was promised is nowhere in sight.  
Right now, 23 million men and women are struggling to find work.  Twenty-three million people, unemployed or underemployed.  Nearly one in six Americans is living in poverty.  Millions of young Americans have graduated from college during the Obama presidency, ready to use their gifts and get moving in life.  Half of them can’t find the work they studied for, or any work at all.  Why are these guys talking about work? Every time they do I loose my damn mind. 
So here’s the question: Without a change in leadership, why would the next four years be any different from the last four years? 
The first troubling sign came with the stimulus.  It was President Obama’s first and best shot at fixing the economy, at a time when he got everything he wanted under one-party rule.  It cost $831 billion – the largest one-time expenditure ever by our federal government. What we don't want to talk about GM here? Or the success of the auto bailout?
It went to companies like Solyndra, with their gold-plated connections, subsidized jobs, and make-believe markets. The stimulus was a case of political patronage, corporate welfare, and cronyism at their worst. You, the working men and women of this country, were cut out of the deal.  Didn't a lot of these funds go to Wisconsin? And how does a Republican hailing from Wisconsin talk about working men and women and keep a straight face?
 What did the taxpayers get out of the Obama stimulus?  More debt.  That money wasn’t just spent and wasted – it was borrowed, spent, and wasted.     
Maybe the greatest waste of all was time. Here we were, faced with a massive job crisis – so deep that if everyone out of work stood in single file, that unemployment line would stretch the length of the entire American continent.  You would think that any president, whatever his party, would make job creation, and nothing else, his first order of economic business.  Ok, go. I demand a job creation plan immediately. How many people are the Romney/Ryan ticket going to provide a paycheck for? I doubt they are going the FRD route.  
But this president didn’t do that.  Instead, we got a long, divisive, all-or-nothing attempt to put the federal government in charge of health care.  
Obamacare comes to more than two thousand pages of rules, mandates, taxes, fees, and fines that have no place in a free country.  Regulations and rules! Oh no! But we're not the party of fear.                                       
The president has declared that the debate over government-controlled health care is over.  That will come as news to the millions of Americans who will elect Mitt Romney so we can repeal Obamacare. 
And the biggest, coldest power play of all in Obamacare came at the expense of the elderly. Whom I don't want to receive Medicare.  
You see, even with all the hidden taxes to pay for the health care takeover, even with new taxes on nearly a million small businesses, the planners in Washington still didn’t have enough money.  They needed more.  They needed hundreds of billions more.  So, they just took it all away from Medicare.  Seven hundred and sixteen billion dollars, funneled out of Medicare by President Obama. I'm pretty sure this is a lie too, but I'm not up to date on my Medicare funding reports. An obligation we have to our parents and grandparents is being sacrificed, all to pay for a new entitlement we didn’t even ask for.  The greatest threat to Medicare is Obamacare, and we’re going to stop it."

"In Congress, when they take out the heavy books oh no, not books and wall charts about Medicare, my thoughts go back to a house on Garfield Street in Janesville.  My wonderful grandma, Janet, had Alzheimer’s and moved in with Mom and me.  Though she felt lost at times, we did all the little things that made her feel loved.  
We had help from Medicare, and it was there, just like it’s there for my Mom today.  Medicare is a promise, and we will honor it.  A Romney-Ryan administration will protect and strengthen Medicare, for my Mom’s generation, for my generation, and for my kids and yours.  Until you blink and we destroy the social safety net. 


Obamacare, as much as anything else, explains why a presidency that began with such anticipation now comes to such a disappointing close.  So our opponents can consider themselves on notice.  In this election, on this issue, the usual posturing on the Left isn’t going to work.  Mitt Romney and I know the difference between protecting a program, and raiding it.  Ladies and gentlemen, our nation needs this debate.  We want this debate.  We will win this debate.    
It began with a financial crisis; it ends with a job crisis.  And my running mate exported all those jobs. 
It began with a housing crisis they alone didn’t cause; it ends with a housing crisis they didn’t correct. Because we wouldn't let them. Regulation is the devil. Deregulate everything and then blame the pro-regulation guys when everything falls apart. 
 It began with a perfect Triple-A credit rating for the United States; it ends with a downgraded America.   I'm pretty sure we were getting down graded anyway...
It all started off with stirring speeches, Greek columns, the thrill of something new.  Now all that’s left is a presidency adrift, surviving on slogans that already seem tired, grasping at a moment that has already passed, like a ship trying to sail on yesterday’s wind.  
President Obama was asked not long ago to reflect on any mistakes he might have made.  He said, well, “I haven’t communicated enough.”  He said his job is to “tell a story to the American people” – as if that’s the whole problem here? He needs to talk more, and we need to be better listeners? I'd rather have Ryan and Romney talk less and try to stick to facts. This is like the popular girl in high school who would just talk and talk, but never really say anything or just share unsubstantiated gossip.   
Ladies and gentlemen, these past four years we have suffered no shortage of words in the White House.  What’s missing is leadership in the White House.  And the story that Barack Obama does tell, forever shifting blame to the last administration, is getting old.  The man assumed office almost four years ago – isn’t it about time he assumed responsibility? 
 In this generation, a defining responsibility of government is to steer our nation clear of a debt crisis while there is still time.  Back in 2008, candidate Obama called a $10 trillion national debt “unpatriotic” – serious talk from what looked to be a serious reformer.  
Yet by his own decisions, President Obama has added more debt than any other president before him, and more than all the troubled governments of Europe combined.  One president, one term, $5 trillion in new debt. I think this is a lie too. But I'd have to look at the budget, plus we know Republican Presidents with Democrat Congress tend to spend more than Democrat Presidents with Republican Congress. 
He created a bipartisan debt commission. They came back with an urgent report.  He thanked them, sent them on their way, and then did exactly nothing. Um, pretty sure this is a lie too. Dems and Republicans are both unwilling to work together on creating a budget that doesn't gut necessary programs without touching military spending. 
Republicans stepped up with good-faith reforms and solutions equal to the problems.  How did the president respond?  By doing nothing – nothing except to dodge and demagogue the issue. 
So here we are, $16 trillion in debt and still he does nothing.  In Europe, massive debts have put entire governments at risk of collapse, and still he does nothing. And all we have heard from this president and his team are attacks on anyone who dares to point out the obvious.  I swear I read somewhere that House Republicans didn't want to get involved in the European debt crisis. 
They have no answer to this simple reality: We need to stop spending money we don’t have. 
My Dad used to say to me: “Son.  You have a choice: You can be part of the problem, or you can be part of the solution.”  The present administration has made its choices. Because choice still exists, but not for long if we have our way.  And Mitt Romney and I have made ours: Before the math and the momentum overwhelm us all, we are going to solve this nation’s economic problems.  At the expense of the poor.
And I’m going to level with you: We don’t have that much time.  But if we are serious, and smart, and we lead, we can do this. We have to hurry the sky is falling! China is buying US bonds! Fear! Fear! 
After four years of government trying to divide up the wealth, we will get America creating wealth again through the exploitation of others. With tax fairness and regulatory reform because we need less regulation and poor people should pay more and the wealthy less, we’ll put government back on the side of the men and women who create jobs, and not the men and women who need jobs.  
My Mom started a small business, and I’ve seen what it takes. Mom was 50 when my Dad died.  She got on a bus every weekday for years, and rode 40 miles each morning to Madison.  She earned a new degree and learned new skills to start her small business.  It wasn’t just a new livelihood.  It was a new life.  And it transformed my Mom from a widow in grief to a small businesswoman whose happiness wasn’t just in the past. With what funds?  Her work gave her hope.  It made our family proud.  And to this day, my Mom is my role model. 
Behind every small business, there’s a story worth knowing.  All the corner shops in our towns and cities, the restaurants, cleaners, gyms, hair salons, hardware stores – these didn’t come out of nowhere.  A lot of heart goes into each one.  And if small businesspeople say they made it on their own, all they are saying is that nobody else worked seven days a week in their place.  Nobody showed up in their place to open the door at five in the morning.  Nobody did their thinking, and worrying, and sweating for them.  After all that work, and in a bad economy, it sure doesn’t help to hear from their president that government gets the credit.  What they deserve to hear is the truth: Yes, you did build that.   
We have a plan for a stronger middle class, with the goal of generating 12 million new jobs over the next four years. Through tax breaks for the wealthy and corporations. So they can continue to under pay their employees, outsource jobs, and kill small businesses. 
In a clean break from the Obama years, and frankly from the years before this president, we will keep federal spending at 20 percent of GDP, or less.  That is enough.  The choice is whether to put hard limits on economic growth, or hard limits on the size of government, and we choose to limit government.  Except for women and gay rights. Government is going to be all up in your business, vaginas, and bedrooms. 
I learned a good deal about economics, and about America, from the author of the Reagan tax reforms – the great Jack Kemp.  What gave Jack that incredible enthusiasm was his belief in the possibilities of free people, in the power of free enterprise and strong communities to overcome poverty and despair.  Free, privileged people. This is all very Ayn Rand, and it scares me a bit. We need that same optimism right now.  
And in our dealings with other nations, a Romney-Ryan administration will speak with confidence and clarity.  Wherever men and women rise up for their own freedom, they will know that the American president is on their side. Except at mic checks and anytime the people organize or assembly. Especially when a union is involved.  Instead of managing American decline, leaving allies to doubt us and adversaries to test us, we will act in the conviction that the United States is still the greatest force for peace and liberty that this world has ever known. USA! USA! We're number 1. 
President Obama is the kind of politician who puts promises on the record, and then calls that the record.  But we are four years into this presidency. The issue is not the economy as Barack Obama inherited it, not the economy as he envisions it, but this economy as we are living it.  
College graduates should not have to live out their 20s in their childhood bedrooms because that is something privilege kids shouldn't have to do, only the generational poor, staring up at fading Obama posters and wondering when they can move out and get going with life.  Everyone who feels stuck in the Obama economy is right to focus on the here and now.  And I hope you understand this too, if you’re feeling left out or passed by: You have not failed, your leaders have failed you. " That sounds like what every privileged kid says when they loose "their spot"in their college. You know what was owed to them for some reason they can't express. That being said, I don't disagree completely. Leaders have failed. They have been bought and paid for by corporations and there should be a reckoning. 

"None of us have to settle for the best this administration offers – a dull, adventureless journey from one entitlement to the next like Social Security, a government-planned life, a country where everything is free but us.  Rand again, who received public assistance before her death by the way. 
Listen to the way we’re spoken to already, as if everyone is stuck in some class or station in life, victims of circumstances beyond our control, with government there to help us cope with our fate. We all have complete control over our lives! Unless they are demanding your papers in Arizona, control over your body because you're a woman, or denying you human rights because you're gay. 

 It’s the exact opposite of everything I learned growing up in Wisconsin, or at college in Ohio, I know I'm ashamed too.  When I was waiting tables, washing dishes, or mowing lawns for money, I never thought of myself as stuck in some station in life.  I was on my own path, my own journey, an American journey where I could think for myself, decide for myself, define happiness for myself. Which has nothing to do with my being white, male, hetero, Christian, etc. That’s what we do in this country.  That’s the American Dream as provide by white people.  That’s freedom, and I’ll take it any day over the supervision and sanctimony of the central planners.  
By themselves, the failures of one administration are not a mandate for a new administration.  A challenger must stand on his own merits.  He must be ready and worthy to serve in the office of president.  
We’re a full generation apart, Governor Romney and I.  And, in some ways, we’re a little different.  There are the songs on his iPod, which I’ve heard on the campaign bus and on many hotel elevators. He actually urged me to play some of these songs at campaign rallies.  I said, I hope it’s not a deal-breaker Mitt, but my playlist starts with AC/DC, and ends with Zeppelin.
 A generation apart. That makes us different, but not in any of the things that matter.  Mitt Romney and I both grew up in the heartland, real America, not the fake America like Chicago or California, and we know what places like Wisconsin and Michigan look like when times are good, when people are working, when families are doing more than just getting by. And not using welfare or unemployment?  And we both know it can be that way again.  
We’ve had very different careers – mine mainly in public service, his mostly in the private sector. He helped start businesses and turn around failing ones in some pretty sketchy ways. By the way, being successful in business – that’s a good thing. Right, just when Romney does it, it looks a lot like greed. 
Mitt has not only succeeded, but succeeded where others could not.  He turned around the Olympics at a time when a great institution was collapsing under the weight of bad management, overspending, and corruption – sounds familiar, doesn’t it?  
He was the Republican governor of a state where almost nine in ten legislators are Democrats, and yet he balanced the budget without raising taxes. Completely on his own...ignore previous statements on the executive branch taking credit for something they couldn't do on their own. Unemployment went down, household incomes went up, and Massachusetts, under Mitt Romney, saw its credit rating upgraded. 
Mitt and I also go to different churches.  But in any church, the best kind of preaching is done by example.  And I’ve been watching that example.  The man who will accept your nomination tomorrow is prayerful and faithful and honorable. Not only a defender of marriage, straight marriage, he offers an example of marriage at its best. Opposed to those bad marriages of poor people. Not only a fine businessman, he’s a fine man, worthy of leading this optimistic and good-hearted country.   
Our different faiths come together in the same moral creed.  We believe that in every life there is goodness; for every person, there is hope.  Each one of us was made for a reason, bearing the image and likeness of the Lord of Life.  Any atheists in the house? [crickets]
We have responsibilities, one to another – we do not each face the world alone.  And the greatest of all responsibilities, is that of the strong to protect the weak.  The truest measure of any society is how it treats those who cannot defend or care for themselves. 
Each of these great moral ideas is essential to democratic government – to the rule of law except regulations, to life in a humane and decent society unless you're female or gay.  They are the moral creed of our country, as powerful in our time, as on the day of America’s founding.  They are self-evident and unchanging, and sometimes, even presidents need reminding, that our rights come from nature and God, not from government.  Which is why women and gays don't get rights. But hey wasn't Jesus kind of into giving to the poor? Dirty commie. 
The founding generation secured those rights for us, and in every generation since, the best among us have defended our freedoms.  They are protecting us right now until we cut them.  We honor them and all our veterans, and we thank them unless they're gay, we're turning that shit around first chance we get
The right that makes all the difference now, is the right to choose our own leaders the same we've had before, white guys.  And you are entitled to the clearest possible choice, because the time for choosing is drawing near. God does this guy like his right to choose. So here is our pledge. 
We will not duck the tough issues, we will lead.  Like banning questions on abortion after that Akin thing. 
We will not spend four years blaming others, we will take responsibility.  By blaming the other guys for fear mongering and downgrading America. 
We will not try to replace our founding principles, we will reapply our founding principles. Like slavery. 
The work ahead will be hard.  These times demand the best of us – all of us, but we can do this.  Together, we can do this. As long as you are part of the "we".
We can get this country working again. Through exploiting labor. We can get this economy growing again.  We can make the safety net safe again. By punishing the poor and helping the "legitimate needy." We can and will do this.  
Whatever your political party, let’s come together for the sake of our country and our mutual fear of women, people of color, and gays.  Join Mitt Romney and me.  Let’s give this effort everything we have.  Let’s see this through all the way.  Let’s get this done. 
 Thank you, and God bless."



Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0812/80423.html#ixzz253ZGuFsS

Tuesday, August 21, 2012

GOP Platform without the rape exception

The GOP has renewed its official platform support for a "human life amendment" to the Constitution, which it does every presidential election season. Of course this time around, they have to endure Rep. Todd Akin's inability to speak in public and Mittens making promises. We all know "Legitimate Rape Guy" forcing those white guys forced Romney/Ryan to do some damage control by pledging that abortion would be legal in the case of rape under a Romney administration.

However, according to CNN, they nabbed a copy of the GOP's draft platform, which doesn't include an exception for rape, incest, life of the mother, Immaculate Conception, or faith based abortion, which needs to be a thing. Romney will stand behind this platform when he accepts the Republican nomination next week. Bad news for Mittens.

So this "human life amendment" is basically personhood, which you know how I feel about all that. The draft written yesterday still needs to be approved by the full platform committee today (Tuesday) and by delegates to the Republican National Convention next week. So will Romney try to change the language? Maybe, but when McCain tried Tony Perkins, the president of the Family Research Council, told McCain it would be political suicide. Of course that turned out to be the least of McCain's problems.

Mittens making promises you probably can't keep. Sad Face.